Re: make error on 9188

2006-03-04 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Friday 03 March 2006 12:00, chromatic wrote: > On Wednesday 01 March 2006 11:19, Beau E. Cox wrote: > > c - Did you have a chance to try my patch? If so, > > did it work? > > It bypassed the build error, so that much definitely works better. I > haven't finished

Re: make error on 9188

2006-03-01 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Monday 27 February 2006 16:43, chromatic wrote: > On Monday 27 February 2006 16:35, Beau E. Cox wrote: > > Is it me or thee? Any ideas out there? > > I'm seeing the same thing on Linux PPC. > > -- c c - Did you have a chance to try my patch? If so, did it work? -- Aloha => Beau;

[RESOLVED?] make error on 9188

2006-02-28 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Monday 27 February 2006 14:35, Beau E. Cox wrote: > On Sunday 26 February 2006 20:48, Beau E. Cox wrote: > > Hi - > > > > My Sunday svn download / make of parrot and pugs > > failed today; parrot revision 11753 built fine, but > > pugs revision 9188 failed i

Re: make error on 9188

2006-02-27 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Sunday 26 February 2006 20:48, Beau E. Cox wrote: > Hi - > > My Sunday svn download / make of parrot and pugs > failed today; parrot revision 11753 built fine, but > pugs revision 9188 failed in make smoke and > make install: > > ... > Skipping Pugs.Run (

make error on 9188

2006-02-26 Thread Beau E. Cox
Hi - My Sunday svn download / make of parrot and pugs failed today; parrot revision 11753 built fine, but pugs revision 9188 failed in make smoke and make install: ... Skipping Pugs.Run ( src/Pugs/Run.hs, dist/build/Pugs/Run.o ) Skipping Pugs.CodeGen.PIR ( src/Pugs/CodeGen/PIR.hs, dist

Re: pugs link error

2006-02-18 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Friday 17 February 2006 14:48, Peter Schwenn wrote: > Dear Beau Cox, > > I can't make explicit sense of > > " > you need to keep > > > the original Parrot source tree around, and let Pugs find one of > > src/{null,parrot,install}_config.o for embedding to happen. > > " > > Could you give a con

Re: use of parrot built source tree in pugs

2006-02-03 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Friday 03 February 2006 07:03 am, Larry Wall wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:18:14PM -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote: > : Hi - > : > : When making pugs, I know that the following env must be > : setup to imbed parrot: > : > : ... > : export PUGS_EMBED="perl5 parrot&

Re: Development version

2006-02-02 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Thursday 02 February 2006 05:55 pm, Kevin Puetz wrote: > Beau E. Cox wrote: > > Hi - > > > > Congrats on your 6.2.11 release! > > > > Did the development (svn) version really jump to 6.28.0? > > Yes. Major pugs releases are numbered by adding the nex

use of parrot built source tree in pugs

2006-02-02 Thread Beau E. Cox
Hi - When making pugs, I know that the following env must be setup to imbed parrot: ... export PUGS_EMBED="perl5 parrot" export PARROT_PATH="/the/parrot/built/source/tree" ... Is the parrot source tree only needed for the pugs make? Can I get rid of it after pugs is sucessfully installed? Is thi

Development version

2006-02-02 Thread Beau E. Cox
Hi - Congrats on your 6.2.11 release! Did the development (svn) version really jump to 6.28.0? I am running some scripts to automate a refresh of parrot and pugs weekly so I can stay in tune with the current effort. To identify my svn downloads by version and revision I: 1) slurp ChangeLog and

Re: pugs link error

2006-02-02 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 09:10 am, Audrey Tang wrote: > Beau E. Cox wrote: > > Compiled/intstalled parrot-0.4.1 revision 11397 (svn). OK. > > Downloaded pugs 6.2.11 revision 8909 (svn). > > r8927 added a probe to Makefile.PL: According to Leo, you need to keep > th

pugs link error

2006-02-01 Thread Beau E. Cox
Hi - Compiled/intstalled parrot-0.4.1 revision 11397 (svn). OK. Downloaded pugs 6.2.11 revision 8909 (svn). Link error: ... Compiling Pugs ( src/Pugs.hs, dist/build/Pugs.o ) /usr/bin/ar: creating dist/build/libHSPugs-6.2.11.a *** Building: /usr/bin/ghc -package stm -package network

Re: [patch] Makefile.PL Perl6-Pugs revision 8877

2006-02-01 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 02:34 am, Audrey Tang wrote: > Nod, it's resolved in r8890 by removing the now-not-used $run. > > Next time around, please commit ahead. :-) A commit bit is on your way. > > Audrey Thank you for the commit bit; I will use it as you asked (I may have questions before m

[patch] Makefile.PL Perl6-Pugs revision 8877

2006-02-01 Thread Beau E. Cox
Hi - The Makefile.PL in revision 8877 (perhaps eariler revisions too) needs the following 'patch' (sed) to recgonize hs-plugins: sed -i -e "s/'-package'/0, '-package'/" Makefile.PL This adds a '0' argument to try_compile (run = 0); otherwise ghc is compiled with: ghc plugins --make -v0 -o ...