On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:46:21AM -0800, Marc M. Adkins wrote:
> I have a Perl program that processes Perl source and generates fake C++
> headers that doxygen will process. Doxygen doesn't have a hook for adding a
I've done the same thing, you can get it or see the output here:
http://smop.org/
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 06:07:34AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote:
> I do most of my work over an ssh connection to my favorite server,
> through gnome-terminal. gnome-terminal does not support unicode, so
> this whole thread has been filled with ?'s and \251's. I can't see a
> thing...
gnome-terminal
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:35:15PM -0400, Erik Lechak wrote:
> If parrot decides to go the route of embedding documents in its C code.
> Please do not use POD! Find a C developer sitting next to you that does
> not know POD and ask them how they like the flow of the ops files.
> Someone suggest
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:21:00PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> *allowing* classes to be frozen) makes life very hard indeed. And no,
> extending via inheritance really doesn't cut it, unless I'm allowed to
> say C and force everything that inherits from
> Object to inherit from NewObject instead.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 03:43:48PM -0400, Melvin Smith wrote:
> Ok, then we should start some nitty-gritty talk. I'm familiar with
> implementing parsers for LR(1) grammars. I hope Larry, and other
> people that have been digesting the Apocalypses (I can't say I have)
> can fill us in about the ch
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 07:12:40AM -0600, Dave Goehrig wrote:
> I brought up the whole low level integer rewrite stuff above, because
> look at it again. That is eactly what we are meant to do when we know
> it is safe to optimize a variable to a more limited domain than say
> 'scalar'. We don't
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 04:35:16PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rather than stumbling around in the dark here, is anyone actually
> experienced with object inheritance? Any Self programmers out there?
> Someone that's actually used this technique often and understands what
> works and what d
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 03:01:18PM -0400, 'John Porter' wrote:
> Thanks for the link, Peter. I have now checked out Dia, and I'm not
> enthusiastic about it. It seems to be a good start, but maturity is
> a long way off. Not only that, but it is cumbersome (imho) to set up.
> I still think I'd
