On 6 Apr 2005, at 13:50, Nicholas Clark wrote:
The roadmap starts with an introduction to Ponie, gives instructions
on how to check it out of CVS and build it, and other useful
information, so I'll avoid duplicating its contents here.
Ponie is using released versions of Perl 5.9.x, rather than
On 11 Aug 2004, at 06:10, Dan Sugalski wrote:
* Networking: socket, accept, connect, listen, etc. (see "Files")
Yeah, and this'll be ever so much fun too. We need to add in select
and poll to that list.
Modern operating systems all have a way to get around the suckiness of
poll/select when yo
On 18 May 2004, at 08:10, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I don't think that this is the best idea. You are later stopping
refcounting anyway. But I can imagine that you might present an SV with
a refcount to (GC-unaware, unmodified) XS code.
It is not the best idea, but it is a temporary solution to the p
On 3 May 2004, at 13:27, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
because the stacktop is not set! so what Parrot_runcode should do is
in
{
if(!parrot->stacktop) {
set_stacktop
When you call C from different locations, this
wouldn't work. So the correct sequence is:
app_x_run_plugin(...) {
void stk;
On 3 May 2004, at 09:11, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Arthur Bergman wrote:
On 2 May 2004, at 12:37, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Can't you call that somewhere in an outer frame? E.g. where you
create
the interpreter.
No, because I might be creating the interpreter in a callback from
the application
On 2 May 2004, at 12:37, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
that simplifies step 1)
No, it entirely misses the point, every time I call into parrot the
place I called parrot_init_stacktop might not, or most likely will not
be in my current stack.
Can't you call that somewhere in an outer frame? E.g. where you
On 2 May 2004, at 11:47, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
All I want to do is.
1) create a parrot interpreter
2) create some pmcs
3) call some code inside parrot with those pmcs
I've now added a missing init function that sets the stack top:
Parrot_init_stacktop(Interp*, void*);
This function can be used
On 2 May 2004, at 10:54, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Arthur Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... The obvious answer
seems to be to have the embedding interface set the top of stack in
each embedding function if it is not set. This would do the right
thing
and make it easy to embed parrot.
No
On 2 May 2004, at 00:20, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Arthur Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
THERE ARE CASES
Arthur, please let's quietly talk about possible issues.
Many libraries that you want to use, demand that you call
"The_lib_init(bla)". This isn't inappropriate, it&
On 30 Apr 2004, at 19:30, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Like it or not DOD/GC has different impacts on the embedder. Above
rules
are simple. There is no "when the PMC isn't used any more decrement a
refcount" and "when you do that and that then icnrement a refcount" or
some such like in XS. This is reall
On 30 Apr 2004, at 12:54, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
... Would it be possible for parrot to
provide an embedder's interface to all the (exported) functions that
checks whether the stack top pointer is set, and if not (ie NULL) it
pulls the address of a local variable in it
This doesn't work:
{
P
On 16 Mar 2004, at 06:36, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
This is a snipped from the stress example program I posted some days
ago
with an additional check if events are to be handled. Both functions
might not be in the extension interface[1].
Would it be possible to have a global variable that indicate
On 15 Mar 2004, at 17:25, Jeff Clites wrote:
We shouldn't, I would think, be snagging any signals unless user code
expresses an interest in the signal. The default disposition of every
signal is either to be ignored, or to abruptly terminate the process,
and we preserve that behavior if we just
On 15 Mar 2004, at 17:20, Jeff Clites wrote:
On Mar 15, 2004, at 7:36 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Arthur Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PDB is too generic ParrotDB_
Of course, "ParrotDB" sounds like "Parrot database"
May be its best if someone who has com
On 15 Mar 2004, at 12:54, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I think all parrot externally visible macros, types and all functions
should be prefixed Parrot_ as a start.
Are patches welcome that change this?
Sure. But we should allow some already used prefixes too, beside
Parrot_.
We have:
Cool, I still th
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mitchell N Charity) wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Marcus Holland-Moritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> One of my modules embeds the ucpp preprocessor, which has a
>> function init_tables(). The same functio
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Sugalski) wrote:
> At 12:25 PM + 3/12/04, Arthur Bergman wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Tracking down test failures in ponie I noticed some tests using
> >SIGINT failing, they don't fail when I change the te
On 12 Mar 2004, at 19:26, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:33:24PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
All PMCs are anchored properly?
Yes. Arthur and I got it down to the appended test case, which is
pure C
embedding and extending parrot.
I a
This is Ponie, development release 2
"And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick ponie anyway? I mean all
you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and
crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit." -- the tick
Welcome to this second deve
Hi,
Tracking down test failures in ponie I noticed some tests using SIGINT
failing, they don't fail when I change the tests using SIGUSR1, making
me think that parrot somehow hijacks SIGINT but not other signals.
Is this per design or is it something that should be fixed?
Arthur
On 3 Mar 2004, at 08:09, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
follow the scheme used in
t/src/basic_3, i.e. run your code via Parrot_run_native().
Tried this, I think the interface to Parrot_run_native() is wrong, it
should most likely be
void* Parrot_run_native(Parrot, func, void*) ;
so you can pass in arg
On 3 Mar 2004, at 08:09, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
I wasn't aware that the Parrot DOD/GC would run even if I wasn't
running any parrot bytecode, so when we started executing larger
amounts of perl code, things got ugly because parrot was GCing from
under our feet!
Do you initialize interpreter->lo_v
Hi,
So I am currently trying to find another segfault, valgrind is helping
me but the only thing it really says is
==24093== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==24093==at 0x8273227: compact_pool (src/resources.c:301)
==24093==by 0x827300C: mem_allocate (src/resou
Hi,
Just a quick check, why is Parrot_register_pmc not named as the other
Parrot_PMC_* functions in the external interface?
Cheers
Arthur
Using valgrind 1.9.6 I find it impossible to use with parrot, is this a
known issue, should I try and get someone to upgrade valgrind for me?
The following impossible happens.
switch% valgrind --num-callers=100 ./parrot examples/assembly/mops.pasm
==23809== Memcheck, a.k.a. Valgrind, a memory er
On 6 Jan 2004, at 17:05, Simon Cozens wrote:
I would have thought that a hash element would itself be a PMC rather
than an immediate value, so a reference to that should be treated just
like any other reference to a PMC.
But this does not hold true if the hash element is in fact conjured up
by
Hi,
I am wondering how the references to hash elements are planned to be
done? The call to set_ must somehow be delayed until the time is right.
$foo = \$hash{key};
$$foo = "bar";
$has{key} is now "bar"
I don't see how the current vtable setup will allow for this in a tied
situation, or will
On Monday, December 15, 2003, at 12:58 pm, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Arthur Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
#0 0x081cef45 in Parrot_PMC_get_pointer (interp=0x82d7f78,
pmc=0x8a0)
That looks like the vtable could be corrupted.
$ p *pmc
$ p *pmc->vtable
So, after a couple of days s
On Wednesday, December 17, 2003, at 02:06 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Well... yes and no. You need to make sure Parrot links against the
thread libraries. You don't, strictly speaking, need to have perl
linked against the threading libraries except... several (perhaps
most) platforms *really* hat
On Wednesday, December 17, 2003, at 12:38 pm, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
$ grep thr_pthread config/gen/platform/*.h
config/gen/platform/darwin.h:# include "parrot/thr_pthread.h"
config/gen/platform/generic.h:# include "parrot/thr_pthread.h"
config/gen/platform/openbsd.h:# include "parrot/thr_pthre
On Wednesday, December 17, 2003, at 11:35 am, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
Unacceptable IMHO. Many people getting prebuild binaries on commercial
OS's
have no choice
I don't see how this is relevant, prebuilt perl or prebuilt parrot?
I don't think we need to worry about prebuilt parrot, and ponie will
After updating and building I notice...
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/abergman/Dev/ponie/perl'
cc -L/home/abergman/Dev/ponie/parrot/blib/lib -o miniperl \
miniperlmain.o opmini.o libperl.a -lnsl -ldl -lm -lcrypt -lutil -lc
-lparrot
/home/abergman/Dev/ponie/parrot/blib/lib/libparrot.a(eve
Hi, today I hit a little bug
#0 0x081cef45 in Parrot_PMC_get_pointer (interp=0x82d7f78,
pmc=0x8a0)
at src/extend.c:44
#1 0x080c5403 in Perl_macro_LvTYPE (sv=0x82d3410) at sv.c:1280
#2 0x080b196f in Perl_hv_fetch_ent (hv=0x8387588, keysv=0x82d3400,
lval=0,
hash=4044421188) at hv.c:
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 05:20 pm, Melvin Smith wrote:
Apologies for the formatting of these replies, I'm at work with Lotus
Notes.
PNI (Parrot Native Interface) is for writing native extensions in C.
So, what I meant is you can write a method for stashing a raw pointer
with
the API tod
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 04:44 pm, Melvin Smith wrote:
In this case I assume the function can either be Perl5 or Parrot?
Sounds like a custom PMC to me. Given the PMC that
could stash function pointers and correctly dispatch gets/sets
you have the option of writing a PNI method for setting
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 03:26 pm, Melvin Smith wrote:
At 02:56 PM 10/27/2003 +, Arthur Bergman wrote:
So I am currently trying to do a Perl5LVALUE pmc, a stumbling block
is however that I need to pass the PMC the thing that it is
lvalueling, I was planning to use the pmc data field
Hi,
So I am currently trying to do a Perl5LVALUE pmc, a stumbling block is
however that I need to pass the PMC the thing that it is lvalueling, I
was planning to use the pmc data field for storing this but I cannot
access it as a extender without violating the API and guessing at
layouts which
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 02:10 pm, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Arthur Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
include/parrot/pobj.h:# define version obj.version
Sorry for that :) We can AFAIK toss the version part of a PObj. Its
almost unused and hardly needed. It could be renamed too
Hi,
Quick question, is it possible to create a specific type of PMC using
extend.h?
Arthur
Hi,
Upgraded parrot today and ran into some snags with in my own
perl5lv.pmc that includes perl.h
The error was
/Users/sky/Documents/Projects/ponie/perl/proto.h:778: parse error
before '.' token
That line is
PERL_CALLCONV void Perl_utilize(pTHX_ int aver, I32 floor, OP* version,
OP* idop,
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, at 07:50 pm, Brent Dax wrote:
Arthur Bergman:
# This gets rid of the very annoying long double might change warning
# under Darwin...
Thanks, applied (config/init/hints/darwin.pl version 1.7).
However, can you see if the diff below my sig (applied against 1.7
Hi,
This gets rid of the very annoying long double might change warning
under darwin, the warning comes from my config.h which has
typedef long double HUGEFLOATVAL;
Arthur
Index: config/init/hints/darwin.pl
===
RCS file: /cvs/publ
Hi,
Is there any documentation, or code I can read to figure out how use
PMCs in embedded mode? I tried to just include parrot/parrot.h in sv.c
but that results in a million (or so ;) errors, so using parrot/embed
would be nice. (it looks like it isn't finished yet, so it is more a
question of
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 05:55 pm, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
From: Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed Sep 10, 2003 5:55:59 pm Europe/London
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur Bergman)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Small test case exception for ponie
Reply-To:
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 05:40 pm, Brent Dax wrote:
Got something a bit better.
Parrot Configure has had syntax for modifying settings without removing
them for a long time:
:add{foo}
:rem{foo}
Until now, it only worked when Configure prompted you interactively for
th
Hi,
I am adding an additional pmc (Perl5LV), however a test fails
t/pmc/pmc...NOK 75# Failed test (t/pmc/pmc.t at line 1650)
# got: 'Perl5LV PMCs have incorrect name ""
# '
# expected: 'All names and ids ok.
# '
t/pmc/pmc...ok 91/91# Looks like you failed 1 tests
Currently if you specify cc and ld flag options at the command line it
totally overrides the ones it finds, this seems non DWIM and non
optimal. This little patch fixes it.
Reason I need this is am moving in pmcs into classes that #include
perl.h and thus need patch/to/perl.h in -I
Arthur
---
Hi,
After a weeks vacation, returning back to work on Ponie I have frequent
motivational problems because subversion is treating me so badly. (ie,
I don't want to change something because it is such a pain then to
commit it, I don't want to upgrade to latest parrot because it will
take a whole
Hi,
In my efforts to embed parrot into perl I stumbled upon something
mildly interesting but most likely terribly hard to track down problem.
If I execute a miniperl (but linked into parrot and with it's own
parrot interpreter) it works, but if the caller closes(STDERR) before
invoking miniper
On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 08:47 am, Jerome Quelin wrote:
May I ask why ponie doesn't use the p6i ml since as I see it, it's
another project for parrot and thus will use $PARROT/languages/ponie
(or perl5 or whatever)?
Jérôme
I think the same reason we don't do it on perl5-porters (because it
Hello,
I just got a question from Lee Pumphret regarding Hook::Scope POST in
loops.
Currently it treats every iteration as a scope entry and scope exit so.
for(1..3) {
POST { print 2 };
print 1;
}
will print "121212",
Since perl6 seems to have a NEXT {} block for doing this, how is POST
an
51 matches
Mail list logo
