On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 19:26, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
>
> > 2. If the ansewr to 0 or 1 is "no", will there be another standard in
> > Perl 6?
>
> Yes. Whatever we do for Parrot.
Thigs are getting clearer and mor
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 14:10, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Anuradha Ratnaweera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just another quick, and possibly dumb, question: Is XS the standard way
> > of binding Perl to a C/C++ library?
>
> If your question is "... of bindin
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 11:24, Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote:
>
> As far as I know, there is no "native" way of calling C/C++ libraries
> from within Perl 5. When C/C++ API involves structures, the
> corresponding Perl binding uses hashes, and an intermediate step
> convert
I am not sure if this is the correct place to ask this, so please point
me to correct direction if it is not.
As far as I know, there is no "native" way of calling C/C++ libraries
from within Perl 5. When C/C++ API involves structures, the
corresponding Perl binding uses hashes, and an intermedi
