[perl #61116] test failing in trunk

# New Ticket Created by (Andreas J. Koenig) # Please include the string: [perl #61116] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61116 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thr

Re: [perl #61116] AutoReply: test failing in trunk

> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:03:17 -0800, "Parrot via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > t/op/callingNOK 73/98 git bisect blames https://svn.perl.org/parrot/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- andreas

[perl #60688] examples/benchmarks/array_access.pir broken

# New Ticket Created by (Andreas J. Koenig) # Please include the string: [perl #60688] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60688 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thr

[perl #60692] Recently introduced slowness

# New Ticket Created by (Andreas J. Koenig) # Please include the string: [perl #60692] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60692 > According to examples/benchmarks/primes2.pir there was a nearly 30x slowdown

[perl #60686] Parallel make broken

# New Ticket Created by (Andreas J. Koenig) # Please include the string: [perl #60686] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60686 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thr

[perl #60576] Out of memory

# New Ticket Created by (Andreas J. Koenig) # Please include the string: [perl #60576] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60576 > --- osname= linux osvers= 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thr

Re: [perl #45103] [TODO] Bundle::Parrot should require minimum version only

> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:47:56 -0700, James Keenan (via RT) <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> said: > In order to continue as a Parrot developer, do I really need to > perform yet another upgrade of Module::Build or Pod::Simple (distros > for which I have little use)? More to the point, is

Re: [svn:perl6-synopsis] r14317 - doc/trunk/design/syn

>>>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 07:21:19 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) >>>>> said: > $spot::(parens) Please accept my apologies for my ignorant posting. Clearly the parens indicate ranges. Sorry for the noise. Going back into lurker-mode, -- andreas

Re: [svn:perl6-synopsis] r14317 - doc/trunk/design/syn

$spot::(parens) > On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:38:17 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > +class Dog:ver<1.2.1>:auth; > +class Dog:ver<1.2.1>:auth; > +class Dog:ver<1.2.1>:auth; > +class Dog:<1.2.1 cpan:JRANDOM> >

Re: fetching module version from the command line

> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:24:37 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > * Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-17 02:00]: >> perl -MDBI\ 999 >> DBI version 999 required--this is only version 1.50. >> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted. > You can use an equals sign in

Re: fetching module version from the command line

> On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:36:52 -0400, "Randy W. Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > David Wheeler wrote: >> On Jul 13, 2006, at 05:56, Fergal Daly wrote: >> >>> That's funny, it looks like I did put some code in to disable the END >>> block if it's "require"d rather than "use"d. Tu

Re: Module Signatures

>>>>> On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 03:52:52 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said: > * Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-07 03:25]: >> Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >> >>>>>>On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:0

Re: Module Signatures

>>>>> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 11:22:16 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:02:00 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>> said: >> >>

Re: Module Signatures

> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 10:02:00 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> (What would be marginally worth it is having PAUSE sign distros. At >> least we can assure that the CPAN mirror didn't tamper with the >> files, which I think is the most likely "attack" on CPAN.) > Frankly,

Re: CPAN and META.yml: no_index dir vs directory

> On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 21:39:06 -0500, Ken Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Jul 5, 2006, at 7:47 PM, David Golden wrote: >> Some potential options: >> >> (a) Add "directory" as a synonym to the spec and add "dir" as >> something that CPAN sites recognize. >> >> (b) Change the s

Re: Perl 6 User FAQ (perl.perl6.users) -- Latest version now on web.

> On Sat, 20 May 2006 13:33:22 -0700, Conrad Schneiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > "Perl 5 is not going away. In fact, Perl 5.9 [will have] > many Perl 6 features you can start using -- see features.pm > for details." That should be "5.10". -- andreas

Re: What is the Value of t/0-signature.t?

> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:51:02 -0800, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi all, > In http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=17934, a Test::MockObject user > dislikes the t/0-signature.t test that always runs. I have filed a couple of bug reports against distributions with a wrong

Re: Request for Comments: Package testing results analysis, result codes

> On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:22:20 +1100, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > 1. Broken or corrupt packaging. > A bad tarball, MANIFEST files missing. Make sure you verify that all files in the distro are readable. Reject if the permissions are bogus. Recently we had an increasig nu

Re: Test::Kwalitee 0.10

>>>>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:41:25 -0800, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wednesday 15 February 2006 12:33, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >> The prerequisite Module::CPANTS::Analyse can currently not be >> installed because it relies on sme YAML import

Re: Test::Kwalitee 0.10

> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:15:01 -0800, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi all, > I've released a snapshot of the long-promised Test::Kwalitee. Internally, it > uses the CPANTS code to analyze a module along 13 of the Kwalitee indicators. > I recommend using this in developer

Re: Binary distributions

>>>>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:13:40 -0800, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said: > Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> FWIW, we're using dh-make-perl to create debian packages from CPAN >> modules. > An

Re: Binary distributions

> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:05:02 -0800, Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Did anybody here have played with CPANPLUS::Dist::Deb? >> http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS-Dist-Deb/ >> >> Believing its documentation, i

Re: Fwd: CPAN Upload: D/DO/DOMM/Module-CPANTS-Analyse-0.5.tar.gz

> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:42:58 +0100, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I am still considering building something[0] that shows the > module-dependency as a graph to show how "bad" the problem has become. > Even "simple" modules like YAML seem to include everything and the > kitchen-

Re: Dependency trees was: CPAN Upload: D/DO/DOMM/Module-CPANTS-Analyse-0.5.tar.gz

> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:26:52 -0800, Luke Closs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > This would allow non-perl people to install perl packages much easier, > without having to mess with the CPAN shell and running tests. It > would also make installing CPAN packages into hosted environments much

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Devel::TypeCheck 1.2

> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:55:26 -0500, Gary Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > The latest release of Devel::TypeCheck adds typing of functions (without polymorphism) as well as numerous bug fixes: > The uploaded file >Devel-TypeCheck-1.2.tar.gz > has entered CPAN as > file:

Re: [perl #38189] [TODO] sort out CPAN modules incorrectly owned by Parrot

> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:34:43 -1000, Joshua Hoblitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > Are you happy with META.yml I proposed or are there other issue > that need to be addressed? Yes, it looks good. -- andreas

Re: [perl #38189] [TODO] sort out CPAN modules incorrectly owned by Parrot

> On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:22:48 -0800, "Joshua Hoblitt via RT" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> said: > Forgot to CC p6i... >> [jhoblitt - Sun Jan 08 14:21:47 2006]: >> >> Is this sufficent as a META.yml or do I also need to explicitly list all >> of the Parrot::* modules as 'provided'? If yo

Re: what slow could be in Compress::Zlib?

> On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:19:16 +0100, "Paul Marquess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > If I give the module a version number like 2.000_00, will the CPAN > shell ignore it? Yes. To be precice, the indexer on PAUSE will ignore it. But don't forget to write it with quotes around. -- andr

Re: benchmarking - it's now all(-1,0,1,5,6)% faster

>>>>> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:31:42 +, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 11:17:57PM +0100, Andreas J. Koenig wrote: >> And it reminds me on my postings to p5p about glibc being very buggy >> up to 2.3 (posted during las

Re: benchmarking - it's now all(-1,0,1,5,6)% faster

> On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:26:39 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Nicholas Clark wrote: >> So I'm confused. It looks like some bits of perl are incredibly sensitive to >> cache alignment, or something similar. > This reminds me on my remarks on JITed mops.pasm which vari

Re: administriflings

> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:51:40 -0700 (PDT), John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >said: > Would I be out of line to request that people edit their email > headers so that replies only go to the list? > I'm tired of getting two (or more) copies of everything on > any thread I've posted in.

Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM?

> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:04:46 +, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > dbmopen() already loads AnyDBM_File to do the real work without the > user (or script) knowing, so this idea could be extended. And nobody in this thread has ever mentioned Time::HiRes. Is there a reason

Re: RFC on Coexistance and simulaneous use of multiple module version s?

> On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 16:37:23 -0500, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > from what I remember we discussed > an idea to allow people and organizations to produce their own list of > approved modules. This is already possible with the CPAN::Site module. > For example, if Oracl