On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 08:42:21PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> On 04/08/2012 06:53 PM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 11:09:30AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> >> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:23:26PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >> >
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:13:37AM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 04/08/2012 10:01 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >
> > The parrotapi-* thing would avoid an update of the parrot package, but
> > there's
> > nothing that would avoid an update of, say, libdata-
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 08:27:26AM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 04/08/2012 07:13 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >> - Debian will package each supported release of Parrot.
> >
> > Isn't this what's already happening? I mean, we already package stable
> &
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 11:09:30AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 03:23:26PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:08:21PM -0400, Andrew Whitworth wrote:
> > > What if we did something like bundling?
> >
> > Is
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:08:21PM -0400, Andrew Whitworth wrote:
> What if we did something like bundling?
Isn't this what Rakudo Star does? AFAICT the Star "distribution" is nothing more
than a bundle of rakudo + nqp + parrot + some Perl 6 modules, which may be nice
from a end user POV, but it's
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 07:12:19PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> Patrick and I just chatted on the phone, here's a summary of the working
> scenario we reached:
>
> - Rakudo will deliver a Rakudo release for each supported ("stable")
> Parrot release, a few days after the Parrot release.
>
> - D
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 12:15:44PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 06:53:49PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 11:09:30AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, aiui Parrot's current implementation requ
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 08:08:28PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> This way we avoid that Parrot-based compilers don't break in the period of
> time
I really meant "This way we avoid the Parrot-based compilers *break*..." -.-"
Cheers
--
perl -E'$_=q;$/= @{[
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 09:46:18AM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 04/08/2012 09:29 AM, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >
> > If we go down the "split to different libraries" path, those libraries
> > should
> > depend on parrotapi-* too so that not only Parro
