On 11/23/06, TSa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HaloO,
Darren Duncan wrote:
> And if Seq and Set etc are interchangeable for all situations where it
> doesn't matter whether the elements are ordered or not, then a lot of
> times users won't have to care which they have.
One can argue that we have t
On 11/9/06, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Opinions welcome. Personally I think I favor the "a compiler is
an object with a 'compile' method" model, and that C gives
us back a compiler object as opposed to a subroutine-like thing.
Would it not be possible to support both? A comp
On Mon, 09 Jun 2003, Mark A. Biggar wrote:
multi factorial (0) { 1 }
multi factorial ($n) { $n * factorial($n - 1) }
That's a bad example, as it's really not MMD. It's a partially
pre-memoized function instead.
It is MMD as long as the dispatching mechanism (of the
language or the engine it runs o
