few other minor changes. As for XHTML 2.0,
that's still a long way off. :-)
--
Aankhen
(We have no branches.)
identifies this message object. May be undef as long as the message
is begin composed.");
.has $content_type = 'text/plain';
}
--
Aankhen
(We have no branches.)
g into
your code.
--
Aankhen
(We have no branches.)
On 9/21/06, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because they speak the same language. That is: they know about arguments
passed via forms, and the preferred output language (xhtml? html?).
Ah, I didn't think of that. My bad. Roles for all these things sound
great to me. :-)
Aankhen
On 9/20/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did qualify my statement.
I'm sorry, I must have missed it. :-)
Aankhen
he Web namespace. There needs to be a Web.pm toolkit (or
something similar), but that's mostly an amalgamation of other
modules.
Aankhen
On 9/19/06, A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Aankhen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-17 21:00]:
> XHTML 1.0 and 1.1 offer no practical benefits over HTML, but
> tangible disadvantages.
To be fair, XHTML does let you embed MathML and SVG (as well as
XForms, pending browse
standard, there won't be any elements that only work in certain
browsers (with the exception of ... no others I can think of
offhand).
Aankhen
--
"I meant *our* species."
"You said *your* species."
"Evidently I am insane. May I go now?"
ad of
just importing CGI, you'd now import HTTP::Request::CGI and
HTML::Generator (I'm throwing names out at random, although I did
write HTTP::Request::CGI as a subclass of HTTP::Request whose members
are populated in a manner similar to CGI.pm's parsing of %ENV).
Aankhen
--
&qu
On 23 Feb 2006 14:15:21 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Log:
> Typo, plus audrey forgot to increment version.
There seems to be another typo on the same line: "just as method like"
instead of "just as methods like".
Aankhen
--
"Why don't you go on a diet!"
"Because I like to eat! Is that a crime?"
ll it the wtf operator.
No, please... how about just calling it the interrobang operator
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang>? :-D
Aankhen
pecify an unflattened array or a hash in a sub call
without any special syntax...
Aankhen
you check if something is a ref? `if (tied($foo))`?
Aankhen
On 7/29/05, Flavio S. Glock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is "for =" only for filehandles? I tried:
No, it's for anything that supports iteration... `=$foo` ==
`$foo.next()`, if I recall correctly. It's probably not yet
implemented.
Aankhen
[sorry Luke, I hit "Send" too soon]
On 7/27/05, Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is probably a better word than "contains". I was thinking set
> > theory when I came up with that one.
What about "derives"?
Aankhen
};
Shouldn't that `CATCH` block be within the `atomic` block? Or did I
miss something?
Aankhen
people squirm every time I change my mind.
Well, you've certainly got everyone flustered enough that they'll be
overjoyed even if you pick the alternative they hated the most... :-)
Aankhen
Surely there is a
viable alternative that doesn't involve outlawing it?
Aankhen
o ~~ m/$bar := (bar|baz)/;
Now $bar will contain either "bar" or "baz", depending on which one was matched.
Hope this is helpful. Corrections are welcome from anyone who spots
any mistakes.
Aankhen
On 5/31/05, Carl Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running `make clean` on WindowsXP is dying with an "expanded command
> line too long" error.
You need to get a later version of nmake. The latest is 7.10, I believe.
Aank
20 matches
Mail list logo
