Oops:
> March 14th, 2021 1pm in California, 9pm in the UK
Now that's *8pm* in the UK. The European Contingent might drop by a
little late today.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 2:12 AM Brad Gilbert wrote:
>
> Ralph, the last value in all functions are not sunk by default,
> so of course the last one in `TWEAK` is not sunk by default.
Right. Thanks for correcting this misleading part of my explanation.
> The bug is that the calling code is not si
I agree with the points Vadim and JJ made: There's a good chance that having a
more official
communication channel would _not_ have prevented surprise here, since the
amount of progress
on the a potential docs redesign seems to have taken many people (including
me!) by surprise.
I guess that's
Rakudo Weekly cannot serve as an offical channel. First of all, because it is
"Rakudo" weekly, not "Raku". There is a good reason for this. Second, because
it's weekly and I don't see why its format should be changed. We may need to
have more prompt response in certain cases. Third, it's first
The official one is what you get when go to docs.raku.org. I can hardly imagine
an acceptable way to have both versions represented under the same domain.
Best regards,
Vadim Belman
> On Mar 14, 2021, at 3:31 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-13 2:27 p.m., Vadim Belman wrote:
>> Concer
My point about the resources were rather an answer to Richard's reaction, as I
understood it. Otherwise, I share the view of "more project is better than no
projects, even if they duplicate". :)
The matter of community definition is a hard one, indeed. To my view we have
two different purposes
The Rakudo Weekly blog gives me a sense of what's going on in the Raku
world, when I remember to check it!
https://rakudoweekly.blog/about-rakudo-weekly/
That site isn't quite what's called for in therms of community discussion
and announcements, but is a decent "organic" overview of what's happen
