Hi there,
On 11.03.21 17:43, William Michels wrote:
> Hi Moritz your book is mentioned below. Care to chime in? Reply to
> perl6-users .
>
> Thx, Bill.
> W. Michels, Ph.D.
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Joseph Brenner
> Date: Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:28 AM
> Subject: Working
Jo,
For what its worth, the search page on http://raku.finanalyst.org now
takes you to ^methods
Previously, a search on '^methods' found the reference, but hide the
location, so the link could not be clicked. That is fixed now.
Regards,
Richard
On 10/03/2021 15:42, Joseph Brenner wrote:
Hello,
I've been chatting with raiph on SO regarding Grammar "tokens" vs
"rules". The OP is here https://stackoverflow.com/q/62051742 and our
discussion is here https://stackoverflow.com/a/62053666 .
I think there's something going on with the examples below, as I'm
seeing different results when
Donald Knuth, "Computer programming as an art", CACM, December 1974:
"In this connection it is most important for us all
to remember that there is no one 'best' style; everybody
has his own preferences, and it is a mistake to try to force
people into an unnatural mold. ... The important thing is
If you interpolate a regex, it is a sub regex.
If you have something like a sigil, then the match data structure gets
thrown away.
You can put it back in as a named
> $input ~~ /
｢9 million｣
pattern => ｢9 million｣
0 => ｢9｣
1 => ｢million｣
Or as a numbered:
> $input
Does this behavior make sense to anyone? When you've got a regex
with captures in it, the captures don't work if the regex is
stashed in a variable and then interpolated into a regex.
Do capture groups need to be defined at the top level where the
regex is used?
{ # From a code example in the "
