On 03/04/2018 06:56 AM, Curt Tilmes wrote:
I also see another bug:
method flags {
do for AddrInfo-Flags.enums { .key if $!ai_flags +| .value }
}
should be
method flags {
do for AddrInfo-Flags.enums { .key if $!ai_flags +& .value }
}
Though you probably do
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 09:47:40 -0700, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:15:05 -0700, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:05:52 -0800, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> > > I dug at this bug a few months back, but lost my notes on my
> > > findings.
> > >
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 09:47:40 -0700, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 07:15:05 -0700, jan-olof.hen...@bredband.net
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:05:52 -0800, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> > > I dug at this bug a few months back, but lost my notes on my
> > > findings.
> > >
>From your description of running the test with nmake I find it reasonable to
>assume you are testing on windows. Winsock seems to have a 1 second delay for
>“connection refused” errors which is triggered (2000 times) by a test added
>with PR 227: https://github.com/perl6/roast/pull/227. I saw
The point of Rats is making Perl6 more correct and less surprising in
common cases, such as
$ perl6
> 1.1+2.2
3.3
> 1.1+2.2 == 3.3
True
> 1.1+2.2 != 3.3
False
vs any language using binary floating-point arithmetic
DB<1> p 1.1+2.2
3.3
DB<2> p 1.1+2.2 == 3.3
DB<3> p 1.1+2.2 != 3.3
1
In that
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 3:32 PM, yary wrote:
> Or instead of 1/2**(32 or 64), re-asking these questions about epsilon:
>
> " Why so large?
>
>Why not zero? "
>
> What's justification for using 1/100,000 vs. something smaller vs. 0 "max
> possible precision?"
>
The problem with using max pos
Further discussion on https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/issues/1588
On 2017-10-18 03:46:20, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2017 08:29:50 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> > Something fishy going on with the Signals enum. If that's fixed then
> > the
> > regression you pointed out will be fix
