That might prove difficult considering how much of the language is
*defined* in outer scopes. (Including, er, the basic grammar.)
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Andy Bach wrote:
> I ran into this article
> https://medium.com/@kasperpeulen/an-interesting-
> programming-feature-that-no-language-h
Let's say this keyword throws away everything in the lexical scope,
except for what you declare
sub compute-G (\a, \b, \c) {
my \d = only-use ( a, b, &infix:<+>, &infix:<*>, &infix:<**> ) {
a + b * 2 ** 3
}
…
return g;
}
I think that would get old real qui
I ran into this article
https://medium.com/@kasperpeulen/an-interesting-programming-feature-that-no-language-has-except-php-4de22f9e3964
The feature allows [you] to write *self invoked anonymous functions that
don’t let any scope from the outer function leak in*. The syntax he
proposes involves th
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:28:32 -0800, comdog wrote:
> This comes from an answer to a Perl 6 question on Stackoverflow that
> showed a different bug:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/45527881/2766176
>
> With put() it does not and gives a strange error:
I guess jnthn++ gets a score point for pre
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:28:32 -0800, comdog wrote:
> This comes from an answer to a Perl 6 question on Stackoverflow that
> showed a different bug:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/q/45527881/2766176
>
> With put() it does not and gives a strange error:
I guess jnthn++ gets a score point for pre
# New Ticket Created by "brian d foy"
# Please include the string: [perl #132549]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132549 >
This comes from an answer to a Perl 6 question on Stackoverflow that
showed a different
