On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 07:27:37 -0700, allber...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Lloyd Fournier
> wrote:
>
> > perl6-loop: 84.8739988
> > c-loop: 67.65849241 (1.25 times faster)
> > native-loop: 0.4981954 (135.81 times faster)
> >
>
> Still quite a lot of optimization to be don
Thanks for taking the time to look into this! I can't reproduce it with
that snippet, even if I make the file nonempty. But I can reproduce it with
the following two snippets. (I could not reproduce when I populated the
input file in the same script that does the await loop.)
perl6 -e '"$*TMPDIR/R
Oh, and when the list of filenames is the simpler `"$*TMPDIR/RT132447.test"
xx 100`, the problem also appears, but it seemed to take many more
iterations to crash. That could be just chance, though.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 4:01 PM Dan Zwell wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to look into this!
Oh, and when the list of filenames is the simpler `"$*TMPDIR/RT132447.test"
xx 100`, the problem also appears, but it seemed to take many more
iterations to crash. That could be just chance, though.
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 4:01 PM Dan Zwell wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to look into this!
Thanks for taking the time to look into this! I can't reproduce it with
that snippet, even if I make the file nonempty. But I can reproduce it with
the following two snippets. (I could not reproduce when I populated the
input file in the same script that does the await loop.)
perl6 -e '"$*TMPDIR/R
Hmmm…. I guess this one does… good point! :-)
> On 18 Nov 2017, at 17:57, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
> wrote:
>
> Does it mean that this now needs tests?
>
> On 2017-10-30 06:42:25, elizabeth wrote:
>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 12:56, Zoffix Znet via RT >> follo...@perl.org> wrote:
>>
Hmmm…. I guess this one does… good point! :-)
> On 18 Nov 2017, at 17:57, Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev via RT
> wrote:
>
> Does it mean that this now needs tests?
>
> On 2017-10-30 06:42:25, elizabeth wrote:
>>> On 24 Oct 2017, at 12:56, Zoffix Znet via RT >> follo...@perl.org> wrote:
>>
Ah, duh, yes, should be a multi :-)
> On 18 Nov 2017, at 19:33, Fernando Santagata
> wrote:
>
> The last iteration of this code snippet is:
>
> multi sub trait_mod:(Attribute:D \attribute, :&proxy!) {
> attribute.package.^add_method(attribute.name.substr(2), my method ($SELF:) {
> Proxy
The last iteration of this code snippet is:
multi sub trait_mod:(Attribute:D \attribute, :&proxy!) {
attribute.package.^add_method(attribute.name.substr(2), my method
($SELF:) {
Proxy.new(
FETCH => { attribute.get_value($SELF) },
STORE => -> $, \value { attribute.set_value($SELF,
Hi Liz,
Thank you and my regards to Moritz too!
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen
wrote:
> > On 17 Nov 2017, at 22:47, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> >> On 17 Nov 2017, at 20:09, Fernando Santagata
> wrote:
> >> I tried to use the code you suggested:
> >>
> >> sub trait_mod:
Does it mean that this now needs tests?
On 2017-10-30 06:42:25, elizabeth wrote:
> > On 24 Oct 2017, at 12:56, Zoffix Znet via RT > follo...@perl.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:12:58 -0700, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:23:55 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote:
> >> The "s
This works now on the JVM backend as well. I've unfudged the old tests and 've
added one test with a P6 regex to S05-metasyntax/regex.t with commit
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/ae57169b24
I'm closing this ticket as 'resolved'.
12 matches
Mail list logo
