net::smtp went missing

2017-05-17 Thread ToddAndMargo
Hi All, Fedora Code 25 # rpm -qa rak\* rakudo-0.2017.04.2-2.fc25.x86_64 # perl6 --version This is Rakudo version 2017.04.2 built on MoarVM version 2017.04 implementing Perl 6.c. One of my programs suddenly stop working with the following error message: Could not find Net::SMTP at line 58 in:

[perl6/specs] 8638e7: Propose fatalization of all redeclaration warnings

2017-05-17 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs Commit: 8638e717e576daaed6d70dc03613dc28fab7a1d6 https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/8638e717e576daaed6d70dc03613dc28fab7a1d6 Author: Zoffix Znet Date: 2017-05-16 (Tue, 16 May 2017) Changed paths: M v6d.po

[perl6/specs] edb5c5: Propose removal of Str.lines: $count param

2017-05-17 Thread GitHub
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs Commit: edb5c57af6e75770e095117002c99778347b289a https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/edb5c57af6e75770e095117002c99778347b289a Author: Zoffix Znet Date: 2017-05-17 (Wed, 17 May 2017) Changed paths: M v6d.po

[perl #130517] [LTA] .max should warn if it sees useless :by parameter ( .max(:by(*.value)) )

2017-05-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 06:31:06 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:29 -0800, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > > Code: > > say { 0 => 1, 1 => 0 }.max(:by(*.value)) > > > > Result: > > 1 => 0 > > > > > > Code: > > say { 0 => 1, 1 => 0 }.max(*.value) > > > > Result: > > 0 => 1 > >

[perl #130517] [LTA] .max should warn if it sees useless :by parameter ( .max(:by(*.value)) )

2017-05-17 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 06:31:06 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:29 -0800, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > > Code: > > say { 0 => 1, 1 => 0 }.max(:by(*.value)) > > > > Result: > > 1 => 0 > > > > > > Code: > > say { 0 => 1, 1 => 0 }.max(*.value) > > > > Result: > > 0 => 1 > >

[perl #128866] [BUG] Array[Int] ~~ Array[Numeric] is false

2017-05-17 Thread Sam S. via RT
> How come last one should be same? Aren't they different types? I'd expect > `Array[Int] ~~ Positional[Numeric]` to give False They are different types, but one could logically be considered a "subtype" of the other (and would be in some programming languages). E.g. in C#, a class Foo which ta