Re: Is there a list out there of all the \n characters?

2017-03-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
On 03/12/2017 03:32 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote: On 03/06/2017 02:14 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: Hi All, Is there a list of all the \n pairs out there somewhere? Many thanks, -T Found it! https://docs.perl6.org/language/regexes#Backslashed,_predefined_character_classes This one helps too: http

Re: Is there a list out there of all the \n characters?

2017-03-12 Thread ToddAndMargo
On 03/06/2017 02:14 AM, ToddAndMargo wrote: Hi All, Is there a list of all the \n pairs out there somewhere? Many thanks, -T Found it! https://docs.perl6.org/language/regexes#Backslashed,_predefined_character_classes -- ~~ Computers are like air conditio

[perl #130984] [DOC] List.Set treatment of Pairs is poorly documented

2017-03-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zefram # Please include the string: [perl #130984] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130984 > The (intentional) treatment of Pair elements in List-to-Set coercion is rather surprising, and

Re: [perl #130982] [PERF] "for $a..$b -> $i { ... }" loops are sometimes much slower than c-style loops

2017-03-12 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Lloyd Fournier wrote: > perl6-loop: 84.8739988 > c-loop: 67.65849241 (1.25 times faster) > native-loop: 0.4981954 (135.81 times faster) > Still quite a lot of optimization to be done on that front. WRT native int, one of the issues is needing to track when boxin

Re: [perl #130976] [BUG] List.Set loses Pair elements

2017-03-12 Thread Zefram
Sam S. via RT wrote: >Not a bug, and explained in the docs: Fair enough. For the record, I didn't think to look at that bit of the documentation: I looked at the List class, which is silent about coercion to Set, and at its superclass Any, which has a cryptic description that I found difficult to