Re: [perl #130982] [PERF] "for $a..$b -> $i { ... }" loops are sometimes much slower than c-style loops

If you think that discrepancy is impressive you're going to love this. I added a version to your example using native ints: https://gist.github.com/LLFourn/8c3e895e789fab957355ce23c9420133 bash-3.2$ perl6 native-int-perf.p6 perl6-loop: 84.8739988 c-loop: 67.65849241 (1.25 times faster) native-loop

[perl #130982] [PERF] "for $a..$b -> $i { ... }" loops are sometimes much slower than c-style loops

# New Ticket Created by Michael Schaap # Please include the string: [perl #130982] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130982 > Perl6-style simple a-to-b loops are often much slower than the corresponding C-style l

[perl #130980] Thunked xx not calling pull-one deep enough?

# New Ticket Created by Elizabeth Mattijsen # Please include the string: [perl #130980] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130980 > $ 6 'my $a = 0; ($a++,) Zxx 42; say $a’ 0 $ 6 'my $a = 0; ($a++,) Xxx 42; say $a’

Re: [perl #130979] [LTA] `use` instead of `sub` give an error with no line number

Fixed with https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/27dc7b155b , even better fixed with https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/1e246665cd . Tests needed. > On 11 Mar 2017, at 04:11, Daniel Green (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Daniel Green > # Please include the string: [perl