[perl #130168] [BUG] Interval supplies < 1ms can get stuck

2016-11-24 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Geoffrey Broadwell # Please include the string: [perl #130168] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130168 > See discussion starting at: https://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6-dev/2016-11-24#i_

[perl #130171] [LTA] Inf.Rat.perl produces a really bad error message (Inf.Rat.perl)

2016-11-24 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev # Please include the string: [perl #130171] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130171 > *Code:* Inf.Rat.perl *Result:* P6opaque: get_boxed_ref could not unb

[perl #130160] [BUG] Flattened list iteration

2016-11-24 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:15:41 -0800, TimTom wrote: > It appears that when iterating lazily through a list that's been > flattened (the first time), sometimes certain elements are not > reached. Thanks for the report. Fixed in https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/61a18c064695cfa16f31187abed62d1

[perl #130170] sleep with huge values does not sleep (sleep 9999999999999999999)

2016-11-24 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-Aleksejev # Please include the string: [perl #130170] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=130170 > *Code:* sleep 999; say ‘awww, that was some good slee

Re: [perl #130160] [BUG] Flattened list iteration

2016-11-24 Thread Lucas Buchala
I found this results that may be related to this issue. Maybe there's some strange interaction between these List methods? > my @a := [0..2, 0..2].flat.cache; say @a (a b c a b c) > my @a := [0..2, 0..2].flat.cache; @a.Bool; @a.elems; say @a (a a b c) > my @a := [0..2, 0..2].flat.cache

Re: [perl #130160] AutoReply: [BUG] Flattened list iteration

2016-11-24 Thread Tim Bollman
I've determined that the issue is the +@partials. Sometimes that is returning 1 as the length of the list instead of the full list. It looks to be whenever the first index set returns the empty set, the size calculation fails. From: perl6 via RT Sent: Wednesday