[perl #129063] Range.contains bug

2016-08-23 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by 刘刊 # Please include the string: [perl #129063] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129063 > liukan@candor:~/Code$ cat foo my $r = 1 .. 19; ( 0 .. 20 ).map: { $r.contains( $_ ).say }; liukan@

[perl #127889] rakudo build failure for ppc64 archi

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Wed Apr 13 05:09:55 2016, norm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: > rakudo build failure for ppc64 archi > > As reported by (1) failure with last tried version rakudo 2016.01 > while the last working version was rakudo 2015.05 > > Probably big-endian specific because no failure with ppc64le archi. >

[perl #128203] S06-advanced/wrap.t in 6.c-errata roast branch fails a test

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Tue Jun 14 19:51:08 2016, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > It's just a bad test that relies too much on the internal > implementation of subtest(). The explanation is here (esp. last few > lines with jnthn++'s explanation): > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/pull/743#issuecomment-210489723 So can we cl

[perl #127538] BEGIN require Test <&ok>;

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Sat Feb 13 16:21:50 2016, lloyd.fo...@gmail.com wrote: > BEGIN require Test <&ok>; > > Lexical with name '&ok' does not exist in this frame Note that this works: > BEGIN { require Test "&ok"} (Test) -- Will "Coke" Coleda

[perl #127569] [BUG] lexical packages leak into SETTING::

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Thu Feb 18 18:38:20 2016, lloyd.fo...@gmail.com wrote: > When a package already exists in an outer scope, any package declared > will > insert itself into it even if it's meant to be lexically scoped. This > includes the SETTING(s) (the most outer scopes). It is also > problematic for > our scop

[perl #127485] "panda look SomeModule" makes perl6 hang (!!)

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
Closing ticket since no longer reproducible; adding a test would be nice, but probably very difficult. -- Will "Coke" Coleda

[perl #127264] [BUG] Inconsistent file information

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Thu Jan 14 03:33:28 2016, nadim.khe...@gmail.com wrote: > $?FILE is the path and file name > > callsframe.file returns the file name only This is no longer an issue in at least 2016.07.1 Closable with tests. -- Will "Coke" Coleda

[perl #126238] LTM does not seem to apply within metaoperators, or does not take new operators in account.

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Thu Oct 01 09:21:34 2015, cognominal wrote: > LTM does not seem to apply within metaoperators, or does not take new > operators in account. > Discussion http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2015-10-01#i_11304291 > > cognominal m: my token infix:sym<--\>> { "$^a -> $^b\n" }; [~] > 'a' X[-->] >

Re: [perl #122346] [@LARRY] "nom regression" behavior of lexicals/invoking sub before they are defined changed

2016-08-23 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:28:26AM -0700, Will Coleda via RT wrote: > > Where the expectation is that the first call to the foo will return an > > undefined value; in nom, it returns 0. > > This behavior has been in place for years now, since before Christmas. > > Tagging [@LARRY] to get a ruling

[perl #125412] [BUG] using syntax "@a of Int" (multiple times) leads to weird type check errors

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Mon Jun 15 01:43:52 2015, andr...@gmail.com wrote: > % perl6 -v > This is perl6 version 2015.05-197-g28a7697 built on MoarVM version > 2015.05-79-g458940f > > > > sub x() returns Array of Int { my @x of Int = 1,2,3 }; > sub x ( --> Array[Int]) { #`(Sub|42347328) ... } > > x().WHAT.say > Type c

[perl #125680] [BUG] "..." produces a low-level backtrace; running code from file and with -e is different

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Fri Jul 24 11:26:41 2015, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Code: > ... > > Result: > Unhandled exception: Stub code executed >at :1 > (/home/alex/git/rakudobrew/moar- > nom/install/share/perl6/runtime/CORE.setting.moarvm:throw:4294967295) > from src/gen/m-CORE.setting:17505 > (/home/alex/

[perl #122346] [@LARRY] "nom regression" behavior of lexicals/invoking sub before they are defined changed

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Sun Jul 20 10:33:13 2014, coke wrote: > S02-names-vars/variables-and-packages.t has several TODO'd tests of > this sort: > > { > nok foo().defined, "get variable not yet declared using a sub (1)"; > is foo(), 1, "get variable not yet declared using a sub (2)"; > is foo(), 2, "get variable

[perl #128485] "Weird node visited"

2016-08-23 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Sun Jun 26 11:42:10 2016, raiph wrote: > What I did > == > > use experimental :macros; > macro m { quasi {} } > m > > What I got > == > > rakudo-moar e071e4: OUTPUT«Weird node visited: QAST::BVal␤» > > What I expected > === > > No output or Nil used in sink conte

Re: can Perl 6 bootstrap itself

2016-08-23 Thread Bennett Todd
I think that would be great. Also lovely if it were completely correct, which I think is perhaps the biggest focus now, or nice and compact and fast, which still has a way to go. Many lovely goals to enjoy working on.

Re: can Perl 6 bootstrap itself

2016-08-23 Thread Andreas Mueller
wouldn't it be nice to have the MoarVM and one piece of software in one file for the job ? Andreas On 22.08.16 16:36, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > is there a minimal tool set (best written in P6), that > can load the necessary rest from the internet to have a complete > Perl6 i

Re: [perl #129044] [BUG] `.first($regex)` throws error on element that doesn't support method .match

2016-08-23 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
Fixed with 157b46e , tests needed > On 22 Aug 2016, at 12:05, Sam S. (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Sam S. > # Please include the string: [perl #129044] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12904