[perl #128860] [LTA] [@LARRY] List.invert only works if the list contains Pairs but the error message isn't very clear about that fact

Binding of the map routine internally now requires list elements to bind as Pair, which improves the error message. (The alternate approach of inserting a CATCH into the map closure could in theory produce an even better message, but it appeared to slow things down more than the Pair binding ap

[perl #128915] [BUG] multi-dim Hash turnes items into List

# New Ticket Created by Wenzel Peppmeyer # Please include the string: [perl #128915] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128915 > my %multi-dim; %multi-dim{1;2;3} = 42; dd %multi-dim{1;2;3} # OUTPUT«(42,)␤» # expec

[perl #123072] [GLR] 'for' loop in sink context isn't invoking block in sink context

Some method calls were not properly sunk as a final statement in a loop. Fix in 977797fa401856e5310155f13469b7e6ff5f620a Test in bc8fa4fd8d449573eb6001b5f43f8890f65b9196

Re: [perl #128818] [BUG] sprintf %f bogus rounding

Attached is a straightforward implementation of the floating-point printf conversions. I believe it to be correct. In addition to the decimal %e, %f, and %g, I did the rather useful hexadecimal %a, thus far entirely missing from Rakudo's sprintf. I needed some supporting floating-point utilities

Re: [perl #128905] [BUG] Some core Routines do not do Callable role

The only difference between “push” and “say” I can find, is that “push” is marked “is nodal” However, trying to replicate this outside of the setting, does work as expected: $ 6 'class A { proto method a() is nodal { } }; say A.^can("a")[0] ~~ Callable True Looks like it is even deeper, at the

Re: [perl #128903] [BUG] SetHash::push not implemented

Will look at this as part of a Set/SetHash overhaul > On 12 Aug 2016, at 05:19, Wenzel Peppmeyer (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Wenzel Peppmeyer > # Please include the string: [perl #128903] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt

Re: [perl #128595] [LTA] -M with non-existant module breaks 'exit' in REPL

Hmmm… the todo’d test for this now passes, but the problem still exists (apart from the hanging). So I guess this is a Test Needs To Be Adapted case. > On 10 Jul 2016, at 22:58, Zoffix Znet (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet > # Please include the string: [perl #1285

Re: [perl #128900] [LHF] Make ^C in REPL abort the current line, if one is running

Fixed with be7ce04 , tests needed Turns out this was slightly more involved than just setting up a CATCH block, as the CATCH block will only be seen either in the executing thread, or in the .tap block of the signal handler. So in the end, I decided to always start the code in a separate threa

[perl #128904] [BUG] - Comparing Shaped Arrays

# New Ticket Created by djgoku # Please include the string: [perl #128904] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128904 > I wanted to do (IRC Log of #perl6: http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2016-08-12#i_13009688

[perl #128914] [BUG] decimal->float conversion differs for literals and Str.Num

# New Ticket Created by Zefram # Please include the string: [perl #128914] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128914 > > "9.998e0".EVAL - "9.998e0".Num 1.77635683940025e-15 Observe that the

[perl #128913] [BUG] decimal->float non-monotonic conversion

# New Ticket Created by Zefram # Please include the string: [perl #128913] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128913 > > "9.9981e0".EVAL < "9.998e0".EVAL True Observe that the literal with

[perl #128912] [BUG] decimal->float bad rounding

# New Ticket Created by Zefram # Please include the string: [perl #128912] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128912 > > (9.999e-5 * 2e0**66).Int * 5**8 - * 2**58 287369 > (9.99895e-5 * 2e0**66).In

Re: [perl #128900] [LHF] Make ^C in REPL abort the current line, if one is running

Working on this now > On 11 Aug 2016, at 20:35, Zoffix Znet (via RT) > wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet > # Please include the string: [perl #128900] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128900 >