# New Ticket Created by
# Please include the string: [perl #128832]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128832 >
grammar Test {
token TOP { (['"'|"'"]) <+print - [s]> ** 1..64 $0 }
};
say Test.parse('"teat"')
# New Ticket Created by Justin DeVuyst
# Please include the string: [perl #128833]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128833 >
[jdv@wieldy ~]$ cat test_grammar_1_thread.p6
use v6;
use XML;
PROCESS::<$SCHEDULER>
A related case, now that I've actually looked at the implementation:
> (2251799813685577e0 * 2e0**-51) - 1
1.46105350040671e-13
> sprintf("%.13f", 2251799813685577e0 * 2e0**-51)
1.2
The Num value in this case is exactly 2251799813685577/2251799813685248,
or 1.1461053500406
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:15:49PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nicholas Clark > wrote:
>
> > I don't know what file would be safer. Maybe mem?
>
>
> None of them. There's no guarantee that /proc exists (non-SVR4 commercial
> Unixes), or that it is in any way
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:15:49PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nicholas Clark > wrote:
>
> > I don't know what file would be safer. Maybe mem?
>
>
> None of them. There's no guarantee that /proc exists (non-SVR4 commercial
> Unixes), or that it is in any way
Re-opening, marking testneeded.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
On Fri May 06 06:54:52 2016, sml...@gmail.com wrote:
> No, this one-liner...
>
> perl6 -e 'my $waiter = Proc::Async.new(:path, :args World>).start; await start { await $waiter }'
>
> ...still occasionally hangs for me on the latest Rakudo nom:
>
> This is Rakudo version 2016.04-117-g7db7b46 buil
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> I don't know what file would be safer. Maybe mem?
None of them. There's no guarantee that /proc exists (non-SVR4 commercial
Unixes), or that it is in any way compatible with Linux's notion of /proc
(FreeBSD, commercial SVR4 that didn't add
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> I don't know what file would be safer. Maybe mem?
None of them. There's no guarantee that /proc exists (non-SVR4 commercial
Unixes), or that it is in any way compatible with Linux's notion of /proc
(FreeBSD, commercial SVR4 that didn't add
# New Ticket Created by Nicholas Clark
# Please include the string: [perl #128831]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128831 >
$ ./perl6-m -Ilib t/spec/S16-io/eof.t
1..2
ok 1 - Regular file EOF was reached
Use of
We now examine the preceding character, and if it's a closing brace, suggest
use of whitespace before curlies taken as a hash subscript.
Fixed in 7ec824e52ab5b285cda47179e6f41e452d870762
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
# Please include the string: [perl #128830]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128830 >
The issue is the lack of space between () and {}:
m: while (0){}
rakudo-moar 051339: OUTP
test:
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/4fdee95e24998498641bc548cb4319cefd6d0a0f
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 5:36 AM Will Coleda via RT <
bugs-comm...@bugs6.perl.org> wrote:
> Re-opening, marking testneeded.
>
> --
> Will "Coke" Coleda
>
Test:
https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/4fdee95e24998498641bc548cb4319cefd6d0a0f
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 4:55 AM Larry Wall via RT <
bugs-comm...@bugs6.perl.org> wrote:
> The logical ops andthen, notandthen, and orelse were not propagating
> wantedness to their thunky args.
>
> Fixed in 7ba6d
On Thu Jul 28 09:58:56 2016, mt1...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks very much for your work, I'll wait and see. I pull rakudo
> versions directly from the github and some day it will be working :-).
>
The version bumps have been done. I've also added tests along the lines of your
examples to the specte
This test now passes, can be closed.
> On 17 Oct 2014, at 23:57, Christian Bartolomaeus via RT
> wrote:
>
> Hmm, it looks like that was not all -- or there is a new problem.
>
> $ perl6-m -e 'for 42 {NEXT (state $val) = $_}; say "alive"'
> alive
>
> This does not fail any longer. But the test
This test now passes, can be closed.
> On 17 Jul 2016, at 21:54, Christian Bartolomaeus via RT
> wrote:
>
> Behaviour for Moar is unchanged. The code works as expected on JVM:
>
> $ perl6-j -e 'for 1, 2 { LAST say $_ }'
> 2
>
> I added a test to S04-phasers/in-loop.t with commit
> https://gi
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #128828]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=128828 >
> my $a = 2476979795053773e0 * (2e0**-51)
1.1
> ($a * (2e0**51)).Int
2476979795053773
> ($a * (
On Wed Jul 27 17:43:50 2016, steve.myn...@gmail.com wrote:
> I've run roast a handful of times in the last few days and didn't see
> that fail once.
>
Not heard anyone mention it in a while either, nor seen it myself. Since we
have a good candidate for a commit that likely fixed the issue, I'll r
On Tue Aug 02 19:37:27 2016, liu...@360.cn wrote:
> liukan@candor:~/Code$ cat p1.pl6
> use v6;
>
> my $p = Promise.start: { sleep 1; 42 };
> $p.then: { say .result }; $p.result;
> my $s = $p.status;
>
> #say $s;
> exit 0;
>
> liukan@candor:~/Code$ perl6 p1.pl6
> 42
> ## this is OK
>
It's not re
20 matches
Mail list logo
