Re: [perl #126654] [POD] Formatting codes does not work inside declarator blocks

2016-01-16 Thread Lloyd Fournier
Forgot, the tricky one is really: #|{ docs for sub { } are in here } sub foo { } ^^ That should be fine and parses properly now. IMO just making the one line work is also acceptable for now I'd say if you can't achieve both. On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM Lloyd Fournier wrote: > I have also

Re: [perl #126654] [POD] Formatting codes does not work inside declarator blocks

2016-01-16 Thread Lloyd Fournier
I have also been down this path. The one line version is doable as you suggested but the #|{ } version is harder because you need to nibble in a sublanguage or do manual balanced text processing, which is why the original author never implemented it I'm guessing. The trick is getting: #|{ do

Re: [perl #127294] Using POD directives in declarative blocks (like I<...>) doesn't work

2016-01-16 Thread Lloyd Fournier
There are now three of these XD. https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=126954 https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=126654 FYI this is really difficult to implement with pod in its present state. IMO We need POD as another language approach to do this properly: https://github.co

[perl #127294] Using POD directives in declarative blocks (like I<...>) doesn't work

2016-01-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Rob Hoelz # Please include the string: [perl #127294] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127294 > For example: #| Here I am sub foo() {} say(&foo.WHY.Str); # Here I am

[perl #127293] DOC INIT { use Module; } fails if Module is not installed, even if --doc is not used

2016-01-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Rob Hoelz # Please include the string: [perl #127293] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127293 > For example: DOC INIT { use Pod::EOD; } If Pod::EOD is not installed, compilation of thi

[perl #127291] [BUG] temp fails to set hashes with non-string key type constraints

2016-01-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by rightfold # Please include the string: [perl #127291] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127291 > The following code: my %h{Pair}; %h{a => 1} = 2; temp %h = %h.clone; should su

Workaround for Perl 5's __DATA__

2016-01-16 Thread Tom Browder
I have tried this in my Perl 6 code (v6.c): =begin DATA blah blah2 =end DATA Then: for $=DATA.lines -> $line { # process a line } but I get this message: Pod variable @=DATA not yet implemented. Sorry. Is there any workaround for this other than putting the data in an array? Thanks. Best

Re: Needed: Rakudo Star with 6.c Christmas Perl 6 release

2016-01-16 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:40 PM, James E Keenan wrote: > Is there a timeline for the release of a Rakudo Star with 6.c? > I don't think there is a specific timeline, but given the rakudo bug fixes since 6.c (in particular with CompUnitRepo, which would have made it difficult to install the modul

Re: Needed: Rakudo Star with 6.c Christmas Perl 6 release

2016-01-16 Thread Brock Wilcox
I think folks were shooting for sometime-this-month. On Jan 16, 2016 1:40 PM, "James E Keenan" wrote: > Today, I posted on the ny.pm mailing list an announcement that I will > attempt to organize a Perl 6 Beginners study group in New York City. > > I have been advised that for an introductory-lev

Needed: Rakudo Star with 6.c Christmas Perl 6 release

2016-01-16 Thread James E Keenan
Today, I posted on the ny.pm mailing list an announcement that I will attempt to organize a Perl 6 Beginners study group in New York City. I have been advised that for an introductory-level group, the Rakudo Star release would be the way to go. However, when I went here: http://rakudo.org/

[perl #127289] stringyfication on type capture in signatures returns the literal of the type capture instead of the resolved type named

2016-01-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Wenzel Peppmeyer # Please include the string: [perl #127289] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127289 > class C {}; sub outer(::T $c){ sub (T){ dd &?ROUTINE.signature.params[0], T ===