# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #126955]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126955 >
The roles CompUnit::Repository::Locally and IO::Local each have a bug
similar to [perl #126935]
Since all you want is a constant, try declaring a submethod that has no
arguments and returns the value, instead, its the same thing. -- Darren Duncan
On 2015-12-17 6:46 PM, TS xx wrote:
Hello dear perl6 users,
I was in the need of declaring a member variable as a constant integer. After
many
Two things jump out at me. One is that I think you don't need that "new"
method. Second -- yes, this is a very old interpreter. I unfortunately
don't know about the twigil variable constant things.
--Brock
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:46 PM, TS xx wrote:
> Hello dear perl6 users,
>
> I was in the
Parrot Raiser via RT wrote:
>Does a shift value longer than the word length make any sense anyway?
With bignums, yes it does.
> -123 +< 200
-197653379443855803891661337357963000110230968235283518742069248
(Also, 32 isn't really my word length.)
-zefram
# New Ticket Created by Lloyd Fournier
# Please include the string: [perl #126954]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126954 >
#| look it's a C!
sub thing { ... }
say &thing.WHY.contents.perl;
#-> ["look its a C"
Hello dear perl6 users,
I was in the need of declaring a member variable as a constant integer. After
many syntax tryouts I came to this one:
class MyClass {
has int $.myConst;
method new () {
return self.bless();
}
submethod BUILD () {
constant $!myConst = 1;
Does a shift value longer than the word length make any sense anyway?
On 12/17/15, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
>> On 17 Dec 2015, at 03:41, Zefram (via RT)
>> wrote:
>>
>> # New Ticket Created by Zefram
>> # Please include the string: [perl #126942]
>> # in the subject line of all future corres
# New Ticket Created by Sam S.
# Please include the string: [perl #126951]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126951 >
Example:
sub f (*%args) {
say .perl for %args.keys
}
my %typedhash :=
Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT wrote:
>Don't think so: if you interpolate a Str into a "", then it calls the
>.Str method on it, *not* the .perl method.
I'm not sure where you think this is relevant. I was not expecting
implicit .perl calls from any interpolation. The code that I proposed
interpolat
> On 17 Dec 2015, at 18:13, Zefram (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Zefram
> # Please include the string: [perl #126950]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126950 >
>
>
> IO::Path.perl produces
> On 17 Dec 2015, at 17:31, Zefram wrote:
>
> Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT wrote:
>> In any case, Str.perl cannot be used, because it puts double quotes
>> around it. Which would be a set of double quotes too many.
>
> I think you've misunderstood somewhere. The code that I proposed does
> not h
# New Ticket Created by Zefram
# Please include the string: [perl #126950]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126950 >
IO::Path.perl produces output of the general form
$a.IO(:SPEC($b),:CWD($c)), but it turns out t
Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT wrote:
>In any case, Str.perl cannot be used, because it puts double quotes
>around it. Which would be a set of double quotes too many.
I think you've misunderstood somewhere. The code that I proposed does
not have a multiple-quotation bug, but what you've committed *d
On Mon Mar 16 05:09:58 2015, elizabeth wrote:
> my num $a; say $a
> NaN
> my num32 $a; say $a
> 0
> my num64 $a; say $a
> NaN
>
Fixed, and test in S02-types/native.t unfudged. Also added a load of related
tests.
> On 17 Dec 2015, at 16:16, Zefram wrote:
>
> Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT wrote:
>> Fixed with 8d50dabfa9a3b690b18a
>
> Done the hard way. Because it lacks most of the refinements of
> Str.perl, it looks like it might still have bugs that Str.perl avoids.
> For example, leading combining charact
> On 17 Dec 2015, at 03:41, Zefram (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Zefram
> # Please include the string: [perl #126942]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126942 >
>
>
> Long right shifts (long
Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT wrote:
>Fixed with 8d50dabfa9a3b690b18a
Done the hard way. Because it lacks most of the refinements of
Str.perl, it looks like it might still have bugs that Str.perl avoids.
For example, leading combining characters will become part of the grapheme
of the opening delimi
# New Ticket Created by Sylvain Colinet
# Please include the string: [perl #126948]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126948 >
I work with a webservice (Discord) that provide timestamp in the ISO 8601
format.
The
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 20:52, Zoffix Znet (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
> # Please include the string: [perl #126936]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126936 >
>
>
> When `is cach
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet
# Please include the string: [perl #126936]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126936 >
When `is cached` trait is used without declaring `use experimental :cached` the
error mes
should have mentioned:
When invoking cuid_1_1450351791.17598 '', provided outer frame
0x7fbeb3c409b0 (cuid_3_1450351791.17598 '') does not match expected
static frame 0x7fbeb3c40ad0 (cuid_2_1450351791.17598 '')
in block at -e:1
and that if you replace the () with 'do' it doesn't happen.
On Th
# New Ticket Created by Lloyd Fournier
# Please include the string: [perl #126945]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126945 >
perl6 -e '{ berp => "lerp", ( with "herp" { $_ => "derp" } ) }'
This is Rakudo version
> On 16 Dec 2015, at 12:31, Zefram (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Zefram
> # Please include the string: [perl #126935]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126935 >
>
>
> The .perl method for IO
Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT wrote:
>As with #126941, commit f6091476486d29c8886d gives this a slightly
>better error message, at least until 6.c.
Providing any error here, rather than a wrong answer, resolves this issue.
At least it does so for the cases with a non-zero lhs, for which the
correct a
> On 17 Dec 2015, at 03:48, Zefram (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Zefram
> # Please include the string: [perl #126943]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126943 >
>
>
> When shifting a non-zer
> On 17 Dec 2015, at 03:37, Zefram (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Zefram
> # Please include the string: [perl #126941]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126941 >
>
>
>> 123 +> (1 +< 64)
> Can
26 matches
Mail list logo
