Carl asked:
>class A {
>method foo($x) {
>PRE { $x < 10 }
># ...
>}
>}
>
>class B is A {
>method foo($a, $b, $c) {
>PRE { [>] $a, $b, $c }
># ...
>}
>}
>
> When C is called, are both C blocks meant to b
We've made great leaps in phaser technology from S04 in Rakudo in the
past week. We used to have C, C, C, and C.
Now we also have C, C, C, C, and (for C
loops) C, C, and C. In his latest blog post [1]
jnthn++ says he'll move on to C and C but that he'll "need
some spec clarifications first".
This
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #111664]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=111664 >
nom: role R { my method !foo() { say 42 } }; class C does R {
method bar() { sel
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: d43113a90c581cfdaca1cc4b2a82b9b8df175768
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/d43113a90c581cfdaca1cc4b2a82b9b8df175768
Author: Felix Herrmann
Date: 2012-03-10 (Sat, 10 Mar 2012)
Changed paths:
M S02
