On 02/23/2011 02:10 AM, Frank S Fejes III wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
>> We can't be everybody's darling, as much as we would love to.
>
> That's a fair statement, however do consider that perl5 is still a
> darling for many system administrators and command-l
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Frank S Fejes III wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
>
>> We can't be everybody's darling, as much as we would love to.
>
> That's a fair statement, however ...
Let me just link to the recent blog post of chromatic:
http://www.modernper
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/perl6/specs
Commit: 02960088797327c82da295b58a0f41898ce7082e
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/02960088797327c82da295b58a0f41898ce7082e
Author: diakopter
Date: 2011-02-22 (Tue, 22 Feb 2011)
Changed paths:
M S05-regex.pod
Log Mess
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> We can't be everybody's darling, as much as we would love to.
That's a fair statement, however do consider that perl5 is still a
darling for many system administrators and command-line warriors who
have long since left awk and sed far behind
On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 11:48 -0500, Mason Kramer wrote:
> Maybe we just need to lay off of the cute one liners and * operator abuse
> when we demo Perl 6. My guess is that those one liners are not nearly as
> impressive to most workaday coders as the type system, MMD, grammars,
> private data, and
I don't grant the premise. Perl 6 is less complex than Perl 5. Number of
operators is not remotely a measure of complexity. Neither is "size of the
interpreter at runtime". "Number of things that the language does for you
in a standardized way" is actually a measure of simplicity, not complexity
Am 22.02.2011 16:57, schrieb Gabor Szabo:
He, as a sysadmin would like to do the small tasks in a relatively
small language. He would like to make sure the modules/applications
he will download and will have to support are in such a relatively small
language.
Whatever Perl 6 will turn out to be
On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 17:35 +0100, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Am 22.02.2011 17:14, schrieb Guy Hulbert:
> > On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 17:57 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> >> For a better comparison that takes in account the features as well see
> >> http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2010/07/an-accurate-comparis
On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 11:28 -0500, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 17:57 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> >> For a better comparison that takes in account the features as well see
> >> http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2010/07/an-accur
Am 22.02.2011 17:14, schrieb Guy Hulbert:
On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 17:57 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
For a better comparison that takes in account the features as well see
http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2010/07/an-accurate-comparison-of-perl-5-and-rakudo-star.html
Thanks for posting this.
Can I
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 17:57 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>> For a better comparison that takes in account the features as well see
>> http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2010/07/an-accurate-comparison-of-perl-5-and-rakudo-star.html
>
> Thanks for p
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 17:57 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>> For a better comparison that takes in account the features as well see
>> http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2010/07/an-accurate-comparison-of-perl-5-and-rakudo-star.html
Just to clarify
On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 17:57 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> For a better comparison that takes in account the features as well see
> http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2010/07/an-accurate-comparison-of-perl-5-and-rakudo-star.html
Thanks for posting this.
Can I infer from this article that it is *rakud
hi,
At FOSDEM I met Arne Wichmann who is a long time sysadmin,
Debian developer and Perl user. We had a short chat in which
he expressed his concerns about the complexity,
the size (memory footprint) and speed of Perl 6,
Without even taking in account the current memory requirements
and speed of
14 matches
Mail list logo
