# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #79868]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=79868 >
rakudo: my $x = [] but role {}; say "alive"
rakudo : OUTPUT«alive»
rakudo: my $x = c
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #79866]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=79866 >
rakudo: my $answer = [] but role { method postcircumfix:<( )>(
($arg) ) { say "You call
On 27/11/2010 18:37, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
On 26/11/2010 17:17, gvim wrote:
I'm new to the Perl 6 lists so can someone tell me if the
"implementations" of Perl 6 will eventually transition to a Perl
6.0.0 standard or will TIMTOWTDI apply to the language itself
indefinitely?
The impleme
On 26/11/2010 17:17, gvim wrote:
I'm new to the Perl 6 lists so can someone tell me if the
"implementations" of Perl 6 will eventually transition to a Perl 6.0.0
standard or will TIMTOWTDI apply to the language itself indefinitely?
The implementations are aiming towards passing a common test s
Roughly speaking, "will TIMTOWTDI apply to the language itself
indefinitely?" = yes.
Perl 5 is a language defined by an implementation, Perl 6 is a
language defined by a syntax and documentation. While there's no
predicting what will happen, as of now it looks like there will be a
few implementati
I'm new to the Perl 6 lists so can someone tell me if the "implementations" of
Perl 6 will eventually transition to a Perl 6.0.0 standard or will TIMTOWTDI apply to the
language itself indefinitely?
gvim
Darren (>):
> (I apologize if
> this isn't correct Perl 6, and I'm not sure how to specify a hash slice that
> returns pairs rather than just values):
Ask, and it shall be given you (by S02):
%hash = (:a, :b);
%hash; # returns 'A', 'B', Nil
%hash :p;# returns a => 'A', b =>
