Re: Large integers, ** and Int

2010-08-15 Thread Darren Duncan
Patrick R. Michaud wrote: On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:08:30AM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Darren Duncan wrote: What is the difference between Parrot bignums and gmp? Could Parrot not just use gmp to implement its bignums? -- Darren Duncan Parrot does use GMP

Re: Large integers, ** and Int

2010-08-15 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:08:30AM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Darren Duncan >wrote: > > > > > > > > What is the difference between Parrot bignums and gmp? Could Parrot > not > > > just use gmp to i

[perl #77232] [BUG] Binary bitshift operators infix:<< +< >> and infix:<< +> >> have too loose a priority in Rakudo

2010-08-15 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #77232] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=77232 > rakudo: say 48 + (0 +< 8); say (48 + 0) +< 8; say 48 + 0 +< 8; # should equal former (s

[perl #64928] The undefinedness of optional arguments and typed attributes in Rakudo

2010-08-15 Thread Carl Mäsak via RT
On Tue Apr 21 06:35:05 2009, masak wrote: > Apologies, the below discussion is long and involved. I've tried to > simplify and reduce as much as I can. > > rakudo: class A { multi method dispatch(@chunks, %param?) { > say %param.perl, defined %param } }; A.new.dispatch([1,2,3]); > A.new.dispatch(