On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:26:15PM -0400, Todd Olson wrote:
> Question: Can Rakudo show its steps in applying the Perl6 grammer
>to a Perl6 program similar to "use re 'debug'" in Perl5?
perl6 --parsetrace
-sorear
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-13 03:36:39 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31660
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Temporal.pod
Log:
[S32] revert C to POSIX integer seconds; don't try to do C's job
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Temporal.pod
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-13 03:36:05 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31659
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] s/Uint/uint/ for speculative native role
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
===
--- docs/P
Hi
- - - -
#!/path/to/perl6
use v6\ ;
- - - -
fails with
- - - -
===SORRY!===
Confused at line 2, near "use v6\\ ;\n"
- - - -
in Rakudo Perl 6, version 2010.06-225-gbb6df24
Is this expected behavior?
Regards,
Todd Olson
Question: Can Rakudo show its steps in applying the Perl6 grammer
to a Perl6 program similar to "use re 'debug'" in Perl5?
Discussion: I found the 'use v6 ;' bug to be a tantalizing invitation
to try to understand part of Rakudo's Perl6/Grammar.pm.
I was/am del
Author: Darren_Duncan
Date: 2010-07-13 02:58:57 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31657
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
add 2-bits/col blob example
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spec/S0
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-13 02:55:37 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31656
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
Log:
[S12] define more forced actions on enum values
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
===
---
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-13 02:44:10 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31655
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] revise blob literals a bit
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-13 02:13:42 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31654
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Log:
[S06] defined callsame/nextsame in terms of callwith/nextwith and callframe
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
=
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-13 02:06:01 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31652
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Temporal.pod
Log:
[Temporal] time is now a pseudo-constant like now, rand, etc
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Temporal.pod
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-13 01:59:37 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31651
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S13-overloading.pod
Log:
[S13] try to make multisig semantics slightly more generic so sigs can do
better pattern matching
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S13-overloading.pod
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-13 01:51:27 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31650
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Log:
[S06] add .args to what a context can return
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
===
---
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-13 01:50:39 +0200 (Tue, 13 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31649
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] typo for jnthn++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-07-12 21:52:08 +0200 (Mon, 12 Jul 2010)
New Revision: 31645
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] try to nail down CATCH exit semantics a bit more water-tightly
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
==
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:59:37PM +0200, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Patrick R. Michaud
> >wrote:
> >>What should the result of True..2 be?
> >
> >Isn't it a question of what the MMD takes as the more significant argument?
> >I would thin
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Darren Duncan wrote:
...
>
> There is also still the need to cover something that looks like a list of
> integers, for the general case of a Blob/Buf literal, and yet it should have
> an appearance more like that of a scalar/number/string/etc than of an
> array/etc
Scott (>):
> Perhaps it's just me, but a boolean value to specify the direction of
> conversion seems wrong-ish.
It's not just you. :)
// Carl
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now
available in t/spec/S32-list/sort.t
commit dda2c2b53e5d047cff3110138f5982f3e8b2270d
Author: bbkr
Date: Mon Jul 12 15:35:39 2010 +
[t/spec] tests for RT #68112 sort doesnt accept &rand (or zero-arg subs in
genera
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now
available in t/spec/S32-list/sort.t
commit 8a55371caf69c520e9c5272fa84b24d6a4f33682
Author: bbkr
Date: Mon Jul 12 15:16:59 2010 +
[t/spec] tests for RT #68112 sort doesnt accept &rand (or zero-arg subs in
genera
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now
available in t/spec/S14-roles/basic.t
commit d848f22aab4c9d42abb32207dcbf1d4a39dc7860
Author: bbkr
Date: Mon Jul 12 15:01:12 2010 +
[t/spec] tests for RT #67768 Cannot declare a role with a name already
assigned
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now
available in t/spec/S32-list/sort.t
commit f9c6673e5b8c50bdc53a1defa548857d03a79a8c
Author: bbkr
Date: Mon Jul 12 14:25:46 2010 +
[t/spec] tests for RT #67010 Error with glibc backtrace dump when cmp used
wrong
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:56 PM, wrote:
> Author: Kodi
> Date: 2010-07-11 19:56:33 +0200 (Sun, 11 Jul 2010)
> New Revision: 31627
>
> Modified:
> docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Temporal.pod
> Log:
> [S32/Temporal] Changed to use a different way of specifying time zones,
> which is hopeful
On Tue Jun 30 12:33:03 2009, KyleHa wrote:
> There's now a test for this in S04-statements/try.t:
>
> {
> my $catches = 0;
> try {
> try {
> die 'catch!';
> CATCH {
> die 'caught' if ! $catches++;
> }
> }
> }
>
cognominal stef (>):
> Currently the Range creator method does not coerce its parameters.
> I think Range should be a role so as to impose some constraint.
> I think Bool..2 should fail.
For what it's worth, I disagree. I think Bool..2 should be equivalent
to 0..2 (since Bool is a type object, w
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #76466]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=76466 >
rakudo: sub foo { my $y; our sub bar { say $y } }; bar
rakudo 7579f7: ( no output )
You
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Aaron Sherman via RT
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:44:40AM -0700, Stephane Payrard wrote:
>> > # both statement below print 1 ad nauseam.
>> >
>> > say ?1..2
>> > say (?1)..2
>>
>> What sho
Aaron Sherman wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:44:40AM -0700, Stephane Payrard wrote:
# both statement below print 1 ad nauseam.
say ?1..2
say (?1)..2
What should the result of True..2 be?
(Note that (1,2) is probabl
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #76462]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=76462 >
rakudo: my %h=('a'=>1,'b'=>2); my $h_ref=\%h; say $h_ref.{'a'}
rakudo 7579f7: OUTPUT«N
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 04:44:40AM -0700, Stephane Payrard wrote:
> > # both statement below print 1 ad nauseam.
> >
> > say ?1..2
> > say (?1)..2
>
> What should the result of True..2 be?
>
> (Note that (1,2) is probably not the correct
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard
# Please include the string: [perl #76456]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=76456 >
$ cat A.pm
role A[::T] { }
$ perl6 A.pm
$ perl6 --target=parse A.pm
===SORRY!===
Met
30 matches
Mail list logo