r31373 -[S03] explain more about the relationship of hypers with lazy infinitude

2010-06-18 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2010-06-19 04:55:36 +0200 (Sat, 19 Jun 2010) New Revision: 31373 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod Log: [S03] explain more about the relationship of hypers with lazy infinitude Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod ==

Re: r31337 -[S02] allow _ between radix and digits as suggested by ajs++

2010-06-18 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:26 PM, ajs wrote: > Attached, I've included test results, the tests and the patch (both to the > spectest suite and nqp-rx) to support this spec change. No... no I didn't. Here it is, attached as text. -- Aaron Sherman Email or GTalk: a...@ajs.com http://www.ajs.com/

Re: r31337 -[S02] allow _ between radix and digits as suggested by ajs++

2010-06-18 Thread Aaron Sherman
Attached, I've included test results, the tests and the patch (both to the spectest suite and nqp-rx) to support this spec change. On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:49 PM, wrote: > Author: lwall > Date: 2010-06-18 01:49:13 +0200 (Fri, 18 Jun 2010) > New Revision: 31337 > > Modified: >   docs/Perl6/Spec/

r31372 -[S06] spec processing of rw vs de-containerized return values

2010-06-18 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2010-06-19 04:24:36 +0200 (Sat, 19 Jun 2010) New Revision: 31372 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod Log: [S06] spec processing of rw vs de-containerized return values Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod ===

Re: Something wrong with str.reverse

2010-06-18 Thread Larry Wall
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:21:52AM +0200, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: : On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:15, Smylers wrote: : : > : > For the benefit of Perl 5 programmers used to string reverse it would be : > nice to have a warning if reverse is invoked with exactly one string : > argument (but not with a

[perl #75850] [BUG] > say %( \( (:a(2)) )).keys # a (:a(2)) should ends up as a positionnal

2010-06-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard # Please include the string: [perl #75850] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75850 > > say%( \( (:a(2)) )).keys a (:a(2)) should ends up as a positionnal -- cogn

[perl #75844] [BUG] Twigil missing form error message : Lexical '$a' not found

2010-06-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard # Please include the string: [perl #75844] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75844 > > my @a=<1 2 3>; @a>>.map: ( '(' ~ $^a ~ ')' ) Lexical '$a' not found > my @a=<1 2 3

r31355 -[S06] order of candidates returned from .cando

2010-06-18 Thread pugs-commits
Author: moritz Date: 2010-06-18 11:34:10 +0200 (Fri, 18 Jun 2010) New Revision: 31355 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod Log: [S06] order of candidates returned from .cando Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod === --

Re: Something wrong with str.reverse

2010-06-18 Thread Jan Ingvoldstad
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 11:15, Smylers wrote: > > For the benefit of Perl 5 programmers used to string reverse it would be > nice to have a warning if reverse is invoked with exactly one string > argument (but not with an array which happens to contain a string as its > only element). > Perhaps

Re: Something wrong with str.reverse

2010-06-18 Thread Smylers
Moritz Lenz writes: > Richard Hainsworth wrote: > > > I dont think the specification regarding 'reverse' has ever changed. > > Actually it has changed. ... In Perl we usually have one operator per > operation. ... reverse() violated that principle, by doing several > different operations dependi

[perl #75846] [BUG] > < 1 2 3 >.map: 2 ~ * ~ 2 # No candidates found to invoke

2010-06-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard # Please include the string: [perl #75846] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75846 > I am not sure how much * is supposed to DWIM > < 1 2 3 >.map: * ~ 2 12 22 32 > <

Re: Something wrong with str.reverse

2010-06-18 Thread Moritz Lenz
Richard Hainsworth wrote: > I dont think the specification regarding 'reverse' has ever changed. Actually it has changed. If my memory serves me right, .flip is not older than one or many one and a half years. The story is rather simple: In Perl we usually have one operator per operation. For exa

[perl #75840] Parrot's ns_func_cleanup branch.

2010-06-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Andrew Whitworth # Please include the string: [perl #75840] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75840 > Here's a patch to make Rakudo build on current Parrot after the ns_func_cleanup bran

[perl #75836] [PATCH] Adding support for Capture.perl method

2010-06-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard # Please include the string: [perl #75836] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75836 > >From 7aab67d352ef4b6688d8ce9d11413825dc8ab3ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stepha

[perl #75834] [BUG] keyword cannot be used as attribute name in object initializer

2010-06-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by rakudo...@autoexec.demon.nl # Please include the string: [perl #75834] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75834 > This (reduced from HTTP::Daemon) used to work in alpha: class HTTP::

[perl #75830] [BUG] 5 ~~ Real (and 5 ~~ Int and Int ~~ Real), but ('foo' but 5) !~~ Real in Rakudo

2010-06-18 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #75830] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75830 > 5 but 'string' is the same as 5 but (role { method Str() { 'string'} }), 5 but True is

[perl #75832] [PATCH] Fix &infix:<...> (separated from earlier patch)

2010-06-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by J S # Please include the string: [perl #75832] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75832 > Fixes #75674: [BUG] [TODO] Make 4 ... 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 (an infix:<...> with a list to the right) do