On 2010-06-02, at 7:59 pm, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
> You're reading this wrong. A regex is like a sub, so your final example
> is saying something more like:
> say rx { $_ } for
Doh, of course! I'm still stuck in P5-think. (Also explains why eval()
worked... that should have give
On Wed Jun 02 14:50:54 2010, david.gr...@telus.net wrote:
> Creating several regexes should return several different objects:
>
> say /@_[0]/, /@_[1]/, /@_[2]/ given
> _block27 _block35 _block43
>
>
> However, inside a loop, instead of different regexes, the final one
> gets repeated:
>
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #75514]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75514 >
rakudo: exit
rakudo 18d996: OUTPUT« in main program body at line 1»
* masak submits
# New Ticket Created by David Green
# Please include the string: [perl #75526]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75526 >
Certain ranges with endpoints that aren't 0-9, A-Z don't work:
say <@>..
say <á>
# New Ticket Created by David Green
# Please include the string: [perl #75524]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75524 >
Creating several regexes should return several different objects:
say /@_[0]/, /@_[1
Jason Switzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:10 AM, wrote:
>
>> Author: masak
>> Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:22 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
>> New Revision: 31043
>>
>> Modified:
>> docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
>> Log:
>> [S32/Containers] Buf does Stringy, too
>>
>> -class
On 2010-05-31, at 5:32 pm, Chris Fields wrote:
> I think, in order to get regexes to work we will need a way of getting the
> name of the matching regex from the Match object somehow. Any idea how to do
> that?
I had started working on this too, and ended up going on quite an adventure...
my
Solomon Foster wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Aaron Sherman wrote:
>> Is there some automatic translation of these examples into tests? If not,
>> here's what they'd be:
>>
>> ok(( (1,2,3,4) «+» (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4,4,6) )
>> ok(( (1,2,3) «+» (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4,4) )
>> ok(( (1,2,3,4) «+« (1,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> Is there some automatic translation of these examples into tests? If not,
> here's what they'd be:
>
> ok(( (1,2,3,4) «+» (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4,4,6) )
> ok(( (1,2,3) «+» (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4,4) )
> ok(( (1,2,3,4) «+« (1,2) ) ~~ (2,4) )
> ok(( (1,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Jason Switzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:10 AM, wrote:
>
> >
> > -class Buf does Positional {...}
> > +class Buf does Positional does Stringy {...}
> >
>
> I never really thought about this, but now that I see it here, it made me
> realize that how
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:51 PM, wrote:
> +
> +(1,2,3,4) »+« (1,2) # always error
> +(1,2,3,4) «+» (1,2) # 2,4,4,6 rhs dwims to ((1,2) xx *).batch(4)
> +(1,2,3) «+» (1,2) # 2,4,4 rhs dwims to ((1,2) xx *).batch(3)
> +(1,2,3,4) «+« (1,2) # 2,4 lhs dwims
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:10 AM, wrote:
> Author: masak
> Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:22 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
> New Revision: 31043
>
> Modified:
> docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
> Log:
> [S32/Containers] Buf does Stringy, too
>
> -class Buf does Positional {...}
> +cl
Darren Duncan wrote:
> With the above addition, you have both Buf and Blob roles as well as Buf and
> Blob types.
>
> I think you need to make each of those just a role or a type, and then add
> another named entity which is the counterpart role or type.
>
> For example, as you have Stringy as a ro
And while we're at it with expanding examples, can we use string
concatenation instead of addition? It makes following what's happening
easier.
eg, +1 on that prior post.
-y
wrote:
> +Regardless of whether the dwim is forced or emergent from the shapes
> +of the arrays, once the side to dwim on has been chosen, the dwim
> +semantics on the dwimmy side are always:
> +
> + (@dwimmyside xx *).batch(@otherside.elems)
> +
> +This produces a list the same length as the c
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 20:19:54 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31054
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] suggestions from dataweaver++
more refinements to the description of the dwim semantics
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
=
Smylers wrote:
> pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl writes:
>
>> Author: lwall
>> Log:
>> [S03] refine hyper dwimminess to be more like APL, with modular semantics
>>
>> + (1,2,3) »+» 1 # 2,4,4,6 rhs dwims to (1 xx *).batch(3)
>
> I'd've expected the output to be 2,3,4; is the 2,4,4,6 cop
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 20:02:31 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31053
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] copy-o spotted by Smylers++
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
===
--- docs/Perl
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 19:54:21 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31052
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] add native blob types
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
===
--- docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 19:30:34 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31051
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] refine Blobs to simply be immutable Bufs, with similar generic
characteristics
Thank you for this change; it was esse
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 19:30:34 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31051
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
Log:
[S02] refine Blobs to simply be immutable Bufs, with similar generic
characteristics
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod
===
Hi,
the attached patch modifying HLLCompiler.pir supports parsing from an
arbitrary rule in a grammar, using the $:rule parameter
Example :
grammar A { token a { a } }; say A.parse('a', :rule).perl
This is nice for testing part of a grammar.
This patch is the result of the following conversat
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl writes:
> Author: lwall
> Log:
> [S03] refine hyper dwimminess to be more like APL, with modular semantics
>
> +(1,2,3) »+» 1 # 2,4,4,6 rhs dwims to (1 xx *).batch(3)
I'd've expected the output to be 2,3,4; is the 2,4,4,6 copy pasta or am
I missing s
Author: lwall
Date: 2010-06-02 18:51:06 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31050
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
Log:
[S03] refine hyper dwimminess to be more like APL, with modular semantics
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
=
# New Ticket Created by Adrian White
# Please include the string: [perl #75504]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75504 >
On Rakudo @ 1727ca53c7052fabe008748b70823bf8460ad656
In trying to write tests for Day 2
# New Ticket Created by Adrian White
# Please include the string: [perl #75502]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=75502 >
Using %() to coerce hash context causes Rakudo to core dump.
e.g. Using Rakudo @ 18d996
Author: masak
Date: 2010-06-02 12:11:42 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31045
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] oh, and let's bump the version, too
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
=
Author: masak
Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:26 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31044
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] Buf.new parameter no longer slurpy
Feedback from implementors suggests that this would be too inefficient.
Also, might be good
Author: masak
Date: 2010-06-02 12:10:22 +0200 (Wed, 02 Jun 2010)
New Revision: 31043
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
Log:
[S32/Containers] Buf does Stringy, too
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/Containers.pod
===
29 matches
Mail list logo
