r29830 - docs/Perl6/Spec

Author: lwall Date: 2010-02-25 01:36:07 +0100 (Thu, 25 Feb 2010) New Revision: 29830 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod Log: [S12] note how lastcall allows nextsame control of nested dispatchers Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod =

r29828 - docs/Perl6/Spec

Author: lwall Date: 2010-02-24 19:26:58 +0100 (Wed, 24 Feb 2010) New Revision: 29828 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod Log: [S03] when and ~~ to warn on direct use of "True" or "False" Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod ==

r29827 - docs/Perl6/Spec

Author: lwall Date: 2010-02-24 19:11:54 +0100 (Wed, 24 Feb 2010) New Revision: 29827 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod Log: [S29] restrict Matcher from taking Bool Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S29-functions.pod === --- doc

r29826 - docs/Perl6/Spec

Author: lwall Date: 2010-02-24 19:10:51 +0100 (Wed, 24 Feb 2010) New Revision: 29826 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod Log: [S02] add semilists as Slicel to go with Parcel Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod === --- docs/

Re: [perl #73034] Variables in closures are shared too eagerly

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 01:42:44AM -0800, Moritz Lenz wrote: > Rakudo now fails the last two tests, the old rakudo (now alpha) passed > them (and Perl 5.10 also passes them, if adapted to Perl 5 syntax). > > It shares $x between both closures, although it shouldn't. In general Rakudo is likely to

[perl #73044] [TODO] user-defined circumfixes in Rakudo

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #73044] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=73044 > std: sub circumfix:<| |>() {}; |*| std 29806: OUTPUT«===SORRY! [...] FAILED 0

r29825 - docs/Perl6/Spec

Author: lwall Date: 2010-02-24 18:12:36 +0100 (Wed, 24 Feb 2010) New Revision: 29825 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod Log: [S02] clarify transitive nature of autocurrying reintroduce WhateverCode for that purpose Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod ===

Temporal in Rakudo

On the heels of the perl6-language thread I started - is there any way in current Rakudo to get a broken-out DateTime from a time() value? -- Mark J. Reed

r29824 - docs/Perl6/Spec

Author: duff Date: 2010-02-24 17:20:23 +0100 (Wed, 24 Feb 2010) New Revision: 29824 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod Log: [S03] closure clarification for the LHS of &infix:<...> Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod =

Re: Temporal seems a bit wibbly-wobbly

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Steve Allen wrote: > Hello Mark Reed and Larry Wall Brought back to the whole list; Larry and I were hardly the only two folks involved in this discussion. > On Feb 23, 6:35 am, markjr...@gmail.com ("Mark J. Reed") wrote: >> OK, this seems to be a point of confus

r29817 - docs/Perl6/Spec

Author: lwall Date: 2010-02-24 09:07:52 +0100 (Wed, 24 Feb 2010) New Revision: 29817 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod Log: [S03] list associative treats non-matching ops as non-associative Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod =