Re: r27888 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-08-06 Thread Moritz Lenz
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: > Author: jimmy > Date: 2009-08-07 05:02:42 +0200 (Fri, 07 Aug 2009) > New Revision: 27888 > > Modified: >docs/Perl6/Spec/S01-overview.pod >docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod >docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod >docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod >doc

r27889 - docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library

2009-08-06 Thread pugs-commits
Author: wayland Date: 2009-08-07 06:07:53 +0200 (Fri, 07 Aug 2009) New Revision: 27889 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod Log: [S32/IO] Made some more mods to the filesystem due to interaction with finanalyst++ Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S32-setting-library/IO.pod ==

[perl #68242] tests available

2009-08-06 Thread kyleha
This is an automatically generated mail to inform you that tests are now available in t/spec/S06-multi/proto.t commit ffe05f1314947976ea1508ff3d1908e6ab3e1a3a Author: kyle Date: Thu Aug 6 21:13:20 2009 + [t/spec] Test for RT #68242 git-svn-id: http://svn.pugscode.org/p...@278

[perl #68234] [BUG] In the precense of other multis with named params, Rakudo doesn't fall back to a general hash slurpy multi

2009-08-06 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #68234] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68234 > It's a948cae51 o'clock, I'm sitting in a nice café with gratis wireless, and I'm getting

[perl #68252] [BUG] .WALK(:name, :descentant) is broken in Rakudo

2009-08-06 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #68252] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68252 > rakudo: 1.WALK(:name,:descendant) rakudo 6ba717: OUTPUT«Parameter type check failed; e

[perl #68242] [BUG] Several proto declarations of the same sub shouldn't be allowed in Rakudo

2009-08-06 Thread Carl Mäsak
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #68242] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68242 > Oh hai, it's me again. I just noticed that Rakudo a948cae5 doesn't throw up its hands in

[perl #58004] Investigate junction of code object failures (S03-junctions/misc.t)

2009-08-06 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Thu Nov 13 12:28:29 2008, pmichaud wrote: > This appears to require autothreading over postcircumfix:<( )>, which > will require either changes to our call dispatcher and/or the ability to > override the VTABLE_invoke function for Junction objects. > > Marking this ticket as stalled for now. >

[perl #58004] Investigate junction of code object failures (S03-junctions/misc.t)

2009-08-06 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Thu Nov 13 12:28:29 2008, pmichaud wrote: > This appears to require autothreading over postcircumfix:<( )>, which > will require either changes to our call dispatcher and/or the ability to > override the VTABLE_invoke function for Junction objects. > > Marking this ticket as stalled for now. >

r27883 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-08-06 Thread pugs-commits
Author: jimmy Date: 2009-08-06 18:07:31 +0200 (Thu, 06 Aug 2009) New Revision: 27883 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod Log: [Spec/S02-bits.pod] fixed spec, see S12 for more. Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod === --- docs

Re: xml grammar

2009-08-06 Thread Raphael Descamps
Am Montag, den 03.08.2009, 11:04 +1000 schrieb Timothy S. Nelson: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Raphael Descamps wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have seen that wayland76 was playing with an XML Grammar on #perl6, so > > I think that it was maybe the time to send what I already have done. > > Raphael: I

r27882 - docs/Perl6/Spec

2009-08-06 Thread pugs-commits
Author: lwall Date: 2009-08-06 15:14:15 +0200 (Thu, 06 Aug 2009) New Revision: 27882 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod Log: [S02] Note that coercion to Nil provides "loop else" functionality Define what we mean by the Parcel type. Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S02-bits.pod ==

[perl #68220] Dwimmyness of hyperoperators is reversed depending on which notation is used

2009-08-06 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Eduardo Marques # Please include the string: [perl #68220] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68220 > This was detected using a build of Rakudo checked out late on July 30. When the actu