# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #67134]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67134 >
ooh, I found another one!
rakudo: regex foo { foo }; "foofoofoo" ~~ /+/;
bar($); sub b
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #67124]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67124 >
rakudo: say "foo" ~~ /<[f] #[comment] + [o]>/
rakudo 5351a3: OUTPUT«perl6regex parse e
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #67122]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67122 >
rakudo: / <[\x1..\xE]> /; say "alive"
rakudo 5351a3: ( no output )
pmichaud:
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #67128]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67128 >
rakudo: module M; grammar G {}; say "foo" ~~ //
rakudo 5351a3: OUTPUT«Null PMC access
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 02:13:03AM -0700, Moritz Lenz via RT wrote:
> On Tue Jun 30 23:35:04 2009, matt-w wrote:
> > This patch moves operator infix: to the setting. S03 says it's
> > defined in terms of cmp, so that's what this does. The old PIR
> > implementation was slightly more complex, and I'
# New Ticket Created by Matthew Walton
# Please include the string: [perl #67100]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=67100 >
This patch moves operator infix: to the setting. S03 says it's
defined in terms of cmp
Fixed in r27349, thanks!
Kyle.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Kyle Hasselbacher wrote:
>>
>> I've written a test for this in S12-methods/what.t in r27345.
>>
>> # RT #66928
>> {
>> lives_ok { &infix:<+>.WHAT }, 'Can .WHAT built-in infix op';
>> isa_ok &infix:<
Kyle Hasselbacher wrote:
I've written a test for this in S12-methods/what.t in r27345.
# RT #66928
{
lives_ok { &infix:<+>.WHAT }, 'Can .WHAT built-in infix op';
isa_ok &infix:<+>.WHAT, Multi, '.WHAT of built-in infix op is Multi';
}
Second one probably wants to be:
ok &infix:<+>.W
