- Original Message
> From: Moritz Lenz
> Ovid wrote:
> > OK, I'm tired of submitting bug reports.
>
> Still bug reports are valuable. When you find your motivation again,
> please continue to submit them.
I meant that I was tired "for that one evening". I do plan to come back to
thi
Hi,
Ovid wrote:
> OK, I'm tired of submitting bug reports.
Still bug reports are valuable. When you find your motivation again,
please continue to submit them.
> Instead, I'll include my new 'Test.pm' as an attachment rather than a patch.
> You can try it locally and see if I've just screwed u
Bob Rogers wrote:
I can't log in, though that may just be because I've forgotten the
password. But the odd thing is that the "Reset Password" page says "The
email and username do not match a known account", even though I know my
ID is "rgrjr" and there are only a few possible email addresses I
Richard (>), Carl (>>), Andy (>>>):
>>> P6 treats the key/value as an anonymous 'pair' object so @ranking is an
>>> list of pairs. That's why:
>>> say @ranking.pop.fmt("$m Medal: %s, %s")
>>>
>>> or, less succinctly:
>>> say (pop @ranking).fmt("$m Medal: %s, %s");
>>>
>>> works - the pair object,
Carl Mäsak wrote:
Andy (>):
P6 treats the key/value as an anonymous 'pair' object so @ranking is an
list of pairs. That's why:
say @ranking.pop.fmt("$m Medal: %s, %s")
or, less succinctly:
say (pop @ranking).fmt("$m Medal: %s, %s");
works - the pair object, popped off into the 'printf' l
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Will Coleda via RT
wrote:
> On Wed Nov 05 13:04:11 2008, chroma...@wgz.org wrote:
>> On Wednesday 22 October 2008 09:28:38 Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
>>
>> > Does this mean that this ticket can be closed and the deprecation item
>> > in DEPRECATED.pod be r
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-01-13 20:30:15 +0100 (Tue, 13 Jan 2009)
New Revision: 24895
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Log:
[S03] remove .contains fossil
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S03-operators.pod
=
On 2009 Jan 12, at 15:17, Ovid wrote:
"
בָּרוּךְ שֵׁם כְּבוֹד מַלְכוּתוֹ
לְעוֹלָם וָעֶד."
If you can't see that in your client, that's Hebrew from http://www.i18nguy.com/unicode/shma.html
and means "Hear O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is One".
Actually that's the res
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 05:17:16PM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> Confirmed -- there are still issues with lexicals in a
>> variety of control blocks.
>>
>>
> I skimmed the code for that today. I noticed that we compiled the blocks
> right away and pushed the
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 08:56:06PM -0800, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> I have the following in a file test.pl
>
> macro doit ($word) {
> return quasi >> <<<$word>>> ;>
> };
Macros aren't implemented in Rakudo yet, aren't likely to be implemented
until after we re-do parsing.
Stalling ticket for
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #62274]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62274 >
Here's a minimal use case.
$ cat A.pm
use B;
say $_;
$ cat B.pm
$CALLER::_ = 42;
$ per
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 07:34:33AM -0800, Donald Hunter wrote:
> It appears that rakudo changes committed over the weekend have broken NCI.
> The last known working revision was #35300 for ext/SQLite3/t/test.p6 which
> is crashing on #35440.
> You'll need to patch ext/SQLite3/Makefile.PL so that it
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Confirmed -- there are still issues with lexicals in a
variety of control blocks.
I skimmed the code for that today. I noticed that we compiled the blocks
right away and pushed them onto @?END at compile time. Is there any
reason not to just compile them with every
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:57:44PM -0800, publiustemp-perl6compil...@yahoo.com
(via RT) wrote:
> This is blocking me implementing a simple 'plan "no_plan"' for tests.
>
> $ perl6 -e 'my $foo = "Goodbye cruel world!"; END { say $foo }'
> Scope not found for PAST::Var '$foo' in
Confirmed -- th
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:11:59PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> But
> my @ranking = %players.sort :{.value}; # white space before :, no ws after :
>
> generates a syntax error with rakudo.
> Is this a raduko bug, or am I not understanding your generic argument?
Rakudo doesn't recognize adver
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 02:02:38PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
>
> As for Perl6Array, that's a rakudo type, not a Perl 6 type, so I
> can't speak for it. I'd just as soon that the name not show up in
> Perl 6's namespace, if I had my druthers.
As far as I know, "Perl6Array" should _not_ be showing
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:19:25AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> > > @array».=trim
> >
> > Won't that fail with 'No such method' on an array of hashes?
> > Or are hyperops applied recursively?
>
> I would expect this to be roughly equivalent to:
>
> for @array { $_ .= trim; }
>
>
# New Ticket Created by Richard Hainsworth
# Please include the string: [perl #62280]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62280 >
Control traits, eg., NEXT, CATCH do not seem to work.
They generate syntax errors
Ovid wrote:
> What should this output?
>
> my @array = ' foo ', ' bar ';
> @array .= trim;
>
> say @array.perl;
>
> And what if I have an array of hashes of hashes of arrays?
>
> Currently you can call 'trim' on arrays, but it's a no-op. Similar issues
> with chomp and friends.
Author: kjs
Date: Tue Jan 13 06:52:29 2009
New Revision: 35488
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[pdd19] Be more explicit; if you don't specify a :main flag, execution starts
at the top.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
=
# New Ticket Created by Richard Hainsworth
# Please include the string: [perl #62278]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62278 >
The feed operators ==> and <== dont appear to work.
Not on the rakudo feature stat
OK, I'm tired of submitting bug reports. Instead, I'll include my new
'Test.pm' as an attachment rather than a patch. You can try it locally and see
if I've just screwed up royally.
Aside from exporting a 'die_on_fail' sub (which is a godsend for debugging), it
also started adding very primit
Ovid wrote:
> Seems Larry's agreed to the .trim method. There are bits that are not agreed
> upon, so this patch only implements what we've agreed upon. It relies on the
> new S29-str/trim.t test in pugs. I committed that earlier and updated
> t/spectest.data.
>
>
> In other words, the pat
# New Ticket Created by publiustemp-perl6compil...@yahoo.com
# Please include the string: [perl #62264]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62264 >
Revision: 35458
perl6 $ perl6 -e 'try { die "Goodbye cruel wor
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #62262]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62262 >
I've added some tests to t/spec/S12-construction/new.t which boil down to:
#+snip
class
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 03:30:05PM -0800, Ovid wrote:
> > From: Larry Wall
> > : my @array = ' foo ', ' bar ';
> > : @array .= trim;
> > : say @array.perl;
> > :
> > : And what if I have an array of hashes of hashes of arrays?
> > :
> > : Currently you can call 'trim' on arrays, bu
* Ovid [2009-01-13 00:35]:
>* Larry Wall [2009-01-13 00:25]:
>> It should probably say "No such method". We have hyperops now
>> to apply scalar operators to composite values explicitly:
>>
>> @array».=trim
>
>
> Won't that fail with 'No such method' on an array of hashes? Or
> are hyperops
27 matches
Mail list logo
