[perl #61086] [PATCH] mk_language_shell script generates wrong

# New Ticket Created by "gabriele renzi" # Please include the string: [perl #61086] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61086 > the default grammar for a newly generated language shell contains the following line

Perl 6 Naming Conventions Re: For your encouragement

Hi, Andy Lester schrieb: > But I agree with you, it's frustrating that that's what people choose to > see. I think, everyone is very happy about the progress and a database interface. But on the other side, the majority only see the interface, and this doesn't look very perlish. So its obvious,

[perl #61070] .WHAT on ~~ expressions yields a Null PMC access

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61070] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61070 > rakudo: ("bac" ~~ /a/).WHAT rakudo 33525: OUTPUT[Null PMC access in get_integer()␤curr

[perl #61078] "in join2" look like debug

# New Ticket Created by Ilya Belikin # Please include the string: [perl #61078] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61078 > Hi! I have compile 33537, and now see in join in join2 when run our app. Look look li

Re: For your encouragement

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:11:30AM -0800, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 09:10 -0600, Andy Lester wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:13 AM, Simon Cozens wrote: > > > > > I just ran this code, which worked with the expected results: > > > > > > Beautiful. Posted to Perlbuzz. > >

[perl #61074] perl6/parrot make spectest_regression failures

# New Ticket Created by johnb # Please include the string: [perl #61074] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61074 > Hi, I was browsing the page: > http://perlgeek.de/blog-en/perl-5-to-6/20-a-grammar-for-xml.h

Re: [perl #61078]"in join2" look like debug

Hi! debug messages is here: ./perl6/src/builtins/any-list.pir:68:say "in join" ./perl6/src/builtins/any-list.pir:76:say "in join2" ./perl6/src/gen_builtins.pir:5394:say "in join" ./perl6/src/gen_builtins.pir:5402:say "in join2" ihrd

Fwd: grammar question

Hi, I found I send this mail only to Patrick, but thought I send it to list too. I still have question about ? and result Match object. Patrick do not answer, mb some one can say what I miss? or this is bug? Forward: Patrick, I read you post in blog about Z, so if I understand right for do [0],

Re: how to write literals of some Perl 6 types?

Carl Mäsak wrote: Paul (>): I can't find anything in the existing synopses about Blobs. Probably looking in the wrong place, sorry. Re-reading that, a slightly tangent (though still on topic, I hope) thought come to mind. The definition of the M

Re: Support for ensuring invariants from one loop iteration to the next?

* David Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-05 15:45]: > I tried to break down the reasons for wanting to write such > loops different ways: > > 1) Simple code […] > 2) Clear code […] > 3) Self-documenting code […] Yes, exactly right. > What we need is something a bit like the "continue" block, >

[Parrot] New comment on Episode 3: Squaak Details and First Steps.

srottak has left a new comment on your post "Episode 3: Squaak Details and First Steps": Hello, is the word some kind of keyword or reserved word, because the example works only after renaming rule expression to something else (fe. the originally generated rule value {...} works) ? Posted by s

Re: [perl #60228] fix for split on zero-width

Oh, sorry. That is wrong. Ignore it, plz. 2008/12/6 Илья <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > tests in attach. > > Review it, please. > > Ilya

Re: [perl #60228] fix for split on zero-width

Hi, tests in attach. Review it, please. Ilya 2008/10/30 via RT Chris Davaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > # New Ticket Created by "Chris Davaz" > # Please include the string: [perl #60228] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.

[perl #61068] Null PMC access when illegally redefining a class inside an eval inside an ok() call from Test.pm

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #61068] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61068 > $ perl6 -v This is Rakudo Perl 6, revision 33481 built on parrot 0.8.1-devel for darwin-

Re: Support for ensuring invariants from one loop iteration to the next?

On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 04:40:32PM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-03 21:45]: > > loop { > > doSomething(); > > next if someCondition(); > > doSomethingElse(); > > } > > I specifically said that I was aware of this solution and that I >