Will Coleda wrote:
Is the smoke server still used?
Can support for the smoke server be dropped?
+1 from me; I vote for smolder.
+1, on not maintaining two independent solutions for the same problem.
Allison
Author: kjs
Date: Sat Nov 15 15:17:37 2008
New Revision: 32679
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[pdd19] update .arg and .result into new forms (.set_arg, etc.)
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
==
--
Author: kjs
Date: Sat Nov 15 14:51:49 2008
New Revision: 32677
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Log:
[pdd19] fix a pod error.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
==
--- trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod (
[oops, forgot to copy the list.]
If darwin has gdb, you can do the following to get a backtrace:
$ gdb parrot
gdb> run t/pmc/packfile_6.pir
[segfault should occur here]
gdb> bt
Mark
Klaas-Jan Stol via RT schrieb:
I think this has been resolved, but not sure.
Can anyone confirm?
It looks like it is not resolved yet.
In src/ops/math.ops I still found:
n_infix, n_abs and n_neg.
Regards,
Bernhard
On Sat Nov 08 00:06:50 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Can you post a backtrace?
>
Attached.
backtrace.packfile_6.pir
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:31 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> chromatic wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:07:18 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>>> Still failing as of r32225; cf
>>> http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/7437/260
>>>
>>> not ok 6 - set_i
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To my way of thinking, deprecation is for parrot features, not
> developer tools, so I don't think we need to follow the same rules
> here. (But if I'm overruled, we need to decide before the release this
> Tuesday.)
>
> I w
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:28 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri Nov 14 11:42:02 2008, bernhard wrote:
>> On Mo. 16. Jun. 2008, 16:50:13, coke wrote:
>> > On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > > While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, i
chromatic wrote:
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 20:07:18 James Keenan via RT wrote:
Still failing as of r32225; cf
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/7437/260
not ok 6 - set_integer_keyed_str
# Failed test 'set_integer_keyed_str'
# at t/pmc/packfile.t line 140.
# Exit
On Fri Nov 14 11:42:02 2008, bernhard wrote:
> On Mo. 16. Jun. 2008, 16:50:13, coke wrote:
> > On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, it is
> > apparent
> > > that there's enough bit rot in tools/util/smokeserv-server.pl
Dave has left a new comment on your post "Register allocation in a PIR
compiler":
Never mind. Something about this was nagging me, so I went back and
read it again, and it looks like you are not spilling registers at all,
but just reusing dead registers. So my comment doesn't apply.
That's the pr
# New Ticket Created by Bruce Stockwell
# Please include the string: [perl #60550]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60550 >
This is a rewrite of t/oo/methods.t to PIR
methods.t | 120
+++
# New Ticket Created by Bruce Stockwell
# Please include the string: [perl #60546]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60546 >
This is rewrite of t/oo/proxy.t to PIR
proxy.t | 89 -
14 matches
Mail list logo
