[perl #60444] [PATCH] Improve junctions to store only unique eigenstates.

I'd like to get a clarification from p6l as to whether junction states should be made unique before applying or rejecting this patch. I'm particularly curious about one() junctions. Also, it seems like it would be better to make the list unique inside of !MAKE_JUNCTION instead of duplicating this

[perl #60290] [TODO] Implement Bool.pick in Rakudo

Applied (with minor improvements) in r32477, thanks! Pm

[perl #60436] [TODO] implement Str.e, Str.s etc. file test operators

# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz # Please include the string: [perl #60436] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60436 > Revision r14601 from the specification: : Log: : get rid of pair methods; $obj ~~ :foo($

[perl #60432] [PATCH]Pipp patch

# New Ticket Created by 卓明亮 # Please include the string: [perl #60432] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60432 > this attachment is a function implementation of 'basename' for pipp. 在此祝你身体å

[perl #58008] Implement loops and conditionals taking pointy blocks

Now implemented in r32471, at least for if, unless, while, and until. I'm awaiting a STD.pm clarification for repeat before implementing those. Thanks! Pm

pointy blocks on repeat

S04 says that pointy blocks are allowed on repeat while blocks when the conditional is on either side of the block. STD.pm currently allows only the case where the conditional is in front -- i.e., STD.pm doesn't currently recognize the form repeat -> $thing { ... } while something(); Is this

Re: [perl #60290] [TODO] Implement Bool.pick in Rakudo

On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 07:35:57PM -0800, Vasily Chekalkin via RT wrote: > On Sun Nov 02 03:43:27 2008, masak wrote: > > > > The core issue of this ticket still remains, though: to implement > > Bool.pick in such a way that it returns either Bool::True or Bool::False. > > Ad-hoc implementation at

[perl #60426] [BUG] Implementation of Enums isn't perfect.

# New Ticket Created by "Vasily Chekalkin" # Please include the string: [perl #60426] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60426 > Hello. rakudo: enum Foo; OUTPUT[A method named 'get_string' already exists in c

Re: A question about role-private attributes

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying to understand the following small portion from S12, and it seems slightly ambiguous to me: === from S12: You may wish to declare an attribute that is hidden even from the class; a completely private role attribute may be declared like this: C The na

A question about role-private attributes

I am trying to understand the following small portion from S12, and it seems slightly ambiguous to me: === from S12: You may wish to declare an attribute that is hidden even from the class; a completely private role attribute may be declared like this: C The name of such a private attrib

[perl #60290] [TODO] Implement Bool.pick in Rakudo

On Sun Nov 02 03:43:27 2008, masak wrote: > > The core issue of this ticket still remains, though: to implement > Bool.pick in such a way that it returns either Bool::True or Bool::False. Ad-hoc implementation attached. I still trying to implement Enum.pick. -- Bacek diff --git a/languages/per

[perl #60418] failed assertion 'PObj_is_PMC_TEST(sig_pmc)' when running t/spec/S12-class/declaration-order.t

# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak" # Please include the string: [perl #60418] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60418 > Rakudo r32450: $ gdb ../../parrot GNU gdb 6.3.50-20050815 (Apple version gdb-768) (Tue