# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #59816]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59816 >
After building parrot, cd compilers/tge && make test;
Test Summary Report
--
# New Ticket Created by Christoph Otto
# Please include the string: [perl #59810]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59810 >
Calling string_hash with a seed value other than the one used in src/hash.c
(3793) ca
On Sat Oct 11 05:07:25 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Christoph Otto (via RT) wrote:
> >
> > In response to a question about comparison operators in Pipp*,
> Allison
> > suggested that I add a variant cmp VTABLE function which returns a
> PMC instead
> > of an INTVAL. This patch adds such a func
Author: larry
Date: Sat Oct 11 11:58:34 2008
New Revision: 14594
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
copy/paste error, moritz++
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +-> {:$name, :$addr, *%guest_data}, $room_num { # WRONG
> +
> +However, as described in the next section, you can always use a
> +sub-signature instead:
> +
> +-> (:$name, :$addr, *%guest_data), $room_num { # WRONG
> +
> +In fact, the [...] and {...} forms are
Author: larry
Date: Sat Oct 11 11:39:24 2008
New Revision: 14593
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
clarify use of [...] and {...} in a signature
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/desig
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 7:43 AM, via RT Florian Hatat
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The diff on the code itself is actually quite small: it was mainly a
> matter of moving some code around, and adding the unique identifier
> instead of the "$optable" static name. It contains an update for
> docs/pct
# New Ticket Created by Florian Hatat
# Please include the string: [perl #59784]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59784 >
Hi,
PGE currently only supports one operator table, while some languages
(for example
Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #59704]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59704 >
sub main :main
$P1 = new 'Integer'
$P1 = 2
$P2 = new 'In
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
>> jerry gay wrote:
>> A combined harness is much better in terms of reporting.
>
> Yes.
>
a combined harness is much easier now that we require T::H 3.
anybody with TH3-shaped tuits who could take a
Christoph Otto (via RT) wrote:
In response to a question about comparison operators in Pipp*, Allison
suggested that I add a variant cmp VTABLE function which returns a PMC instead
of an INTVAL. This patch adds such a function, named pmc_cmp. It's named
pmc_cmp rather than cmp_pmc to try to
Moritz Lenz wrote:
jerry gay wrote:
A combined harness is much better in terms of reporting.
Yes.
the tests we expect to pass reliably should be the default tests we
run. we expect all spectest_regression tests to pass reliably. the
default test target should always be named 'test'. it seems
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #59794]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59794 >
exists and delete are now adverbs on the subscript operator, not methods
or functions. It
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #59790]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59790 >
perl t/stm/basic_mt.t hangs since about October 5 under cygwin. This is
reproducib
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Klaas-Jan Stol via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Why should this be a PAST::Var node as opposed to
> simply
> > > using a
> > > PAST::Op node with :pirop('getprop')
> and/or
> > > :pirop('setprop') ?
> > >
> > > Pm
> >
> >
> > Why is this different than attribute access
# New Ticket Created by Christoph Otto
# Please include the string: [perl #59782]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59782 >
In response to a question about comparison operators in Pipp*, Allison
suggested that
jerry gay wrote:
.\src\pmc\float.c(3340) : warning C4204: nonstandard extension used
: non-constant aggregate initializer
there are now hundreds of these warnings in that build. we do have
warnings ratcheted up pretty high, but i don't think it's worth
relaxing them for this construct unless
17 matches
Mail list logo
