Larry Wall wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:57:30PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> : What's the status of numeric upgrades in Perl 6? Is see the docs say "Perl
> 6
> : intrinsically supports big integers and rationals through its system of type
> : declarations. Int automatically supports p
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:57:30PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
: What's the status of numeric upgrades in Perl 6? Is see the docs say "Perl 6
: intrinsically supports big integers and rationals through its system of type
: declarations. Int automatically supports promotion to arbitrary precisi
What's the status of numeric upgrades in Perl 6? Is see the docs say "Perl 6
intrinsically supports big integers and rationals through its system of type
declarations. Int automatically supports promotion to arbitrary precision" but
it looks like it's doing the same thing as Perl 5.
$ ./perl6 -e
On Friday 03 October 2008 18:14:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log:
> [pipp] implement clone, add, i_add and assign_pmc and enable associated
> tests
>
>
> Modified: trunk/languages/pipp/src/pmc/phparray.pmc
> ===
>=== --- trunk
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:28 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri Oct 03 08:55:12 2008, coke wrote:
>> This is a patch-response to r31585, which required a particular
>> version of Storable in one file.
>>
>> Attached, find a patch which bumps our core perl requirement to 5.8.
On Fri Oct 03 08:55:12 2008, coke wrote:
> This is a patch-response to r31585, which required a particular
> version of Storable in one file.
>
> Attached, find a patch which bumps our core perl requirement to 5.8.6,
> the first time this particular version of Storable was included as a
> core mod
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
>> note to treematching folks: it is envisaged that signatures in
>> a rule will match nodes in a tree
>>
>>My question is, how is this expected to work? Can someone give an
>> example?
>
>I'm assuming that this relates to Jon Lang's comment about using
>
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:37 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 03 October 2008 11:19:34 Will Coleda wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell <
>> Fair enough. For these two files, I recommend something more like:
>>
>> use 5.008; # get nice error on older
On Friday 03 October 2008 11:19:34 Will Coleda wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell <
> Fair enough. For these two files, I recommend something more like:
>
> use 5.008; # get nice error on older perls
> use 5.8.6; # our actual requirement
>
> Which is from the slightly
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 08:55 -0700, Will Coleda wrote:
>> Index: Makefile.PL
>> ===
>> -BEGIN { require 5.008 }
>> +BEGIN { require 5.8.6 }
>
>> Index: Con
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 08:55 -0700, Will Coleda wrote:
> Index: Makefile.PL
> ===
> -BEGIN { require 5.008 }
> +BEGIN { require 5.8.6 }
> Index: Configure.pl
> ===
> -use
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #59600]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59600 >
This is a patch-response to r31585, which required a particular
version of Storable in on
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:23:14AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +parrotclass = split '::', $S0
> +$P0 = getinterp
> +$P0 = $P0['namespace';1]
> +$P0 = $P0.get_name()
> +$P0 = shift $P0
> +unshift parrotclass, $P0
> +parrotclass = get_root_namespace [parrotclass]
Th
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 02:16:01PM -0700, I Sop wrote:
>
> I just copied the 'attribute' method, renamed everything, and changed the
> parameter order for the 'getprop' op.
Why should this be a PAST::Var node as opposed to simply using a
PAST::Op node with :pirop('getprop') and/or :pirop('setpr
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:02:56AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +#?rakudo skip ',='
> +#?DOES 2
> +{
> +my @a = 1, 2;
> +is (@a ,= 3, 4).join('|'), '1|2|3|4', ',= on lists works the same as
> push (return value)'
> +is @a.join('|'), '1|2|3|4', ',= on lists works the same as push
15 matches
Mail list logo
