* Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-11 21:20]:
> As a first shot at that definition, I'll submit:
>
> 1 .. $n # easy
> 1 .. *# hard
>
> On the other hand, I can argue that if the first expression is
> easy, then the first $n elements of 1..* should also be
> considered easy, a
On Thursday 11 September 2008 14:04:20 Clark Cooper wrote:
> However:
>
> 1) make test had this result:
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
> ---
> t/perl/Parrot_Test.t 666 55 57
James E Keenan wrote:
1. I will encourage all of you who wrote me to get Bitcard accounts
(http://tinyurl.com/5eqcw8) so that you're eligible to post patches
through our RT interface (http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public). One of the 6
already has an RT account; the others of you should get one.
On Thu Sep 11 08:30:49 2008, moritz wrote:
> Since the feedback so far was mostly positive (and none defeating) I now
> applied the patch. Thanks go to all contributers and testers.
>
> If there are some problems with the test harness, please open a new
ticket.
>
FWIW: Here are the results I got
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:47 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution. I think
> that it has remained unresolved for so long because the original post
> originally called for two steps: (a) removal from Configure.pl of
> c
I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution. I think
that it has remained unresolved for so long because the original post
originally called for two steps: (a) removal from Configure.pl of
configuration steps which probed for features only used in specific
language implementati
Hi,
Here is a pure PIR example that doesn't depend on Rakudo at all.
.sub main :main
$P0 = new 'Integer'
$P0 = 2
'f'($P0)
.end
.sub 'f'
.param pmc l
.lex "$l", l
$P0 = find_lex "$l"
if $P0 <= 0 goto ret
print "entering "
$P1 = find_lex "$l"
say $P1
$
The patch was indeed applied in r30640 (with touch-ups in r30645) on
2008-08-29. There have been no complaints, so I am resolving the ticket.
Thank you very much.
kid51
On Thu Sep 11 14:28:08 2008, rblasch wrote:
>
> I haven't seen this using Visual C++ 9.0. I'll also run a test with
> 6.0, 7.1 and 8.0. Is it okay if I close this ticket if nothing special
> shows up?
Absolutely!
Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
Will Coleda wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:11 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is it just me ...?
Yup.
I've got same problems... This link not always appears on reply page.
(In my case it's appears very rare...)
Ah, so it's not just me!
I had t
On Mon Sep 08 09:08:50 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rakudo, r30888. When defining a grammar and regex, defining a regex
> after a grammar places the regex in the grammar namespace, but vice
> versa works fine. Below is some demo code (switch the definition
> placements and comment out t
I just downloaded and built parrot-0.7.0. The PIR program from the original
bug report no longer SEGFAULTS.
However:
1) make test had this result:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
---
t/perl/Parr
NotFound wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:12 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The line numbers reported by clang seem sensible enough, but do they match
>> values in src/pmc/default.str? Mine contains:
>>
>> #define _CONST_STRING_45 80
>> #define _CONST_STRING_103 534
>> #define _C
Will Coleda wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:51 PM, James Keenan via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Coke, particle: Where do we stand on this ticket?
>>
>> thank you very much.
>>
>> kid51
>>
>
> I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months now, msvc or
> otherwise. Smolder is
On Tue Sep 09 07:34:40 2008, bacek wrote:
> perl6 via RT wrote:
> >
> > During investigating bug from #58276 I found very nasty bug with
> > assigning to Perl6Scalar.
>
> Actually bug #58278.
>
Actually wasn't Perl6Scalar itself, but rather what a proto did in item
context. Fixed that in r31004
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 08:50:02AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: At the moment the design of Perl 6 (unlike certain FP languages) is
: that any dependence on the *degree* of laziness is erroneous, except
: insofar as infinite lists must have *some* degree of laziness in order
: not to use up all your
On Thursday 11 September 2008 07:17:56 Carl Mäsak wrote:
> Jonathan (>), Carl (>>):
> >> This also works, but segfaults:
> >>
> >> $ ./perl6 -e 'class A {}; sub c { say A.new.b() }; c'
> >> Method 'b' not found for invocant of class 'A'
> >> current instr.: 'c' pc 99 (EVAL_13:42)
> >> called from
On Thursday 11 September 2008 04:03:27 Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
> > Now that we can subclass PMCs with Objects, we need to go through all
> > the code in src/pmc/*.pmc that directly fiddles with PMC guts (e.g.
> > PMC_int_val(...) and PMC_num_val(...) and replace them with VTA
On Wed Aug 27 02:10:10 2008, moritz wrote:
> On Mon Aug 25 01:37:17 2008, masak wrote:
> > r30528:
> > $ ./perl6 -e 'while ("test" ~~ /(es)/) { say $0; exit; }'
> > Null PMC access in get_pmc_keyed_int()
> > [...]
> > Segmentation fault
> >
> > FWIW, the error shows up in r30503, whose slightly Or
2008/9/11 Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:56 PM, James Keenan via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Coke, particle: Can we get an update on the issues raised in this RT?
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>> kid51
>
> I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months
Hi,
All broken examples in this ticket now work as or r22207.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Jonathan (>), Carl (>>):
>> This also works, but segfaults:
>>
>> $ ./perl6 -e 'class A {}; sub c { say A.new.b() }; c'
>> Method 'b' not found for invocant of class 'A'
>> current instr.: 'c' pc 99 (EVAL_13:42)
>> called from Sub '_block11' pc 17 (EVAL_13:11)
>> called from Sub 'parrot;PCT::HLLCom
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 07:53:13PM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Patrick:
>
> Where do we stand in the deprecation cycle re these three methods?
I probably just need to remove the methods from the code,
see what breaks, and fix what breaks. I'll try to do that this
weekend before the relea
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 05:34:14AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
> The second patch was not quite correct - we need to have it :multi for
> when we implement the regex variant. I changed it to:
>
> .sub 'split' :method :multi('String')
>
> So it's a bit more liberal about what sorts of s
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 08:11:50AM -0400, James E Keenan wrote:
> Is it just me ...?
>
> When I went to rt.perl.org just now to reply to a ticket, I could not
> find the toggle for automatically CC-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] I
> know it was there just last night. I am clearly logged in to RT. Wh
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Vasily Chekalkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:11 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it just me ...?
>>
>> Yup.
>>
>>> When I went to rt.perl.org just now to reply to a ticket, I could not
>>>
On Wed Sep 03 11:10:21 2008, masak wrote:
> Implement the '...', '???' and '!!!' operators, as described in S03:1691.
I've just done in r30980 the argumentless case of '...':
sub foo { ... }
my $x = foo(); say $x;
Attempt to execute stub code (...).
The argument version needs a bit more work as
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="09080402060404020800"
X-Posted-By: 122.110.103.226
--09080402060404020800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; form
On Sun Jul 27 08:06:04 2008, masak wrote:
> This also works, but segfaults:
>
> $ ./perl6 -e 'class A {}; sub c { say A.new.b() }; c'
> Method 'b' not found for invocant of class 'A'
> current instr.: 'c' pc 99 (EVAL_13:42)
> called from Sub '_block11' pc 17 (EVAL_13:11)
> called from Sub 'parrot;
Hi,
This is implemented in r30983, as are $() and %() (which mean $($/) and
%($/) respectively). Also unfudge'd a spec test.
Jonathan
Hi,
This is implemented in r30983, as are $() and %() (which mean $($/) and
%($/) respectively). Also unfudge'd a spec test.
Jonathan
Hi,
This is implemented in r30983, as are $() and %() (which mean $($/) and
%($/) respectively). Also unfudge'd a spec test.
Jonathan
Hi,
This is implemented in r30983, as are $() and %() (which mean $($/) and
%($/) respectively). Also unfudge'd a spec test.
Jonathan
On Fri Sep 05 08:26:34 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rakudo r30787 dies on multi dispatch when subset types are involved:
>
Yes; this ticket depends on us switching over to the new
multi-dispatcher (perl6multisub.pmc), which does handle this case. I
hope to get that sorted out in the near futur
Will Coleda wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:11 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it just me ...?
Yup.
When I went to rt.perl.org just now to reply to a ticket, I could not find
the toggle for automatically CC-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know it was
there just last night. I am
On Fri Aug 29 13:14:19 2008, ronaldxs wrote:
> > $ < empty ./perl6 -e 'say split("\n", $*IN.slurp)' # but this fails
>
> Two proposed patches attached. The patch to src/pmc/parrotiio.pmc seems
> to fix the problem as originally stated. Then the patch to
> languages/perl6/src/classes/Str.pir see
2008/9/11 James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Moritz,
>
> I applied parallel-r.patch to trunk at r30978 on Darwin (10.4 PPC),
> successfully built and tested Parrot, built Perl 6, then got the results
> below out of 'make test'.
>
> Since I build and test Perl 6 infrequently, I'm not sure wh
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:56 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coke, particle: Can we get an update on the issues raised in this RT?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> kid51
>
I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months now, msvc or
otherwise. Smolder is probably a bett
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:51 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coke, particle: Where do we stand on this ticket?
>
> thank you very much.
>
> kid51
>
I haven't touched a win32 build of parrot in some months now, msvc or
otherwise. Smolder is probably a better place to look for
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 8:11 AM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it just me ...?
Yup.
> When I went to rt.perl.org just now to reply to a ticket, I could not find
> the toggle for automatically CC-ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know it was
> there just last night. I am clearly logged i
No problems have surfaced since last post: closing ticket.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
Moritz,
I applied parallel-r.patch to trunk at r30978 on Darwin (10.4 PPC),
successfully built and tested Parrot, built Perl 6, then got the results
below out of 'make test'.
Since I build and test Perl 6 infrequently, I'm not sure whether these
results are different from what I would have gotten
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:14 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Apr 07 21:31:15 2008, coke wrote:
>> This has been removed in the type_ids branch.
>
> Coke,
>
> Can you provide any update on this deprecation and/or the type_ids branch?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> kid51
>
Moritz Lenz wrote:
I tried to build parrot with the clang, an llvm frontend. It provides a
script called 'ccc', which accepts the same options as gcc.
Configure works fine (perl Configure.pl --verbose --cc=ccc --link=ccc).
Works for me with "perl Configure.pl --cc=llvm-gcc --link=llvm-gcc".
Vasily Chekalkin wrote:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>> I tried to build parrot with the clang, an llvm frontend. It provides a
>> script called 'ccc', which accepts the same options as gcc.
>
> Works for me with "perl Configure.pl --cc=llvm-gcc --link=llvm-gcc".
That works for me too, but it's a complet
Will Coleda via RT wrote:
On Tue Jul 22 23:34:13 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
This version of the patch should dtrt with all versions of
strerror_r. It
works on my Debian/x86 box and I'll be testing it on any *nix I can
get my
hands on Tuesday. If it works f
46 matches
Mail list logo
