On Sun Aug 24 09:30:43 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm running coverage analysis to see whether there
> are any new branches/conditions in lib/Parrot/Configure/Compiler.pm
> which need testing.
I never cease to find coverage analysis rewarding for its ability to
enable you to spot dead cod
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:15:05AM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
> > I think it would be best if all boolean contexts collapse consistently,
> > and I would consider all of those to be boolean contexts. More
> > precisely, && and || are boolean on the left, but not on the right.
>
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 05:05:46PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
: On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 03:00:54PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
: > : Question to p6l: do && and || autothread? Or do they collapse the
: > : junction prior to evaluation? (I hope the latter, since I think it's
: > : more dwimmy).
:
Larry Wall wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:22:25PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : Moritz Lenz wrote:
> : > Tests 34 to 36 were a bit overcritical:
> : >
> : > (0|undef && say "not ok 34") || say "not ok 34";
> : > (0&undef && say "not ok 35") || say "not ok 35";
> : > (0^undef && say "not ok 36
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 03:00:54PM -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
> : Question to p6l: do && and || autothread? Or do they collapse the
> : junction prior to evaluation? (I hope the latter, since I think it's
> : more dwimmy).
> :
> : Also do prefix: and prefix: collapse the junction?
>
> I think it wo
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:22:25PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
: Moritz Lenz wrote:
: > Tests 34 to 36 were a bit overcritical:
: >
: > (0|undef && say "not ok 34") || say "not ok 34";
: > (0&undef && say "not ok 35") || say "not ok 35";
: > (0^undef && say "not ok 36") || say "not ok 36";
: >
: >
Moritz Lenz wrote:
> Tests 34 to 36 were a bit overcritical:
>
> (0|undef && say "not ok 34") || say "not ok 34";
> (0&undef && say "not ok 35") || say "not ok 35";
> (0^undef && say "not ok 36") || say "not ok 36";
>
> but are easily corrected. The rest seem fine to me.
Easier said than done.
Q
Stephen Simmons (via RT) wrote:
> I've attached a file, junctions.p6, which illustrates that binary junctions
> treat "undef" as true, and not as false. My interpretation is that if you
> have:
> if JUNCTION { THEN }
>
> the JUNCTION simplifies down to a simple logical operation, as in Perl 5
> (
# New Ticket Created by "Stephen Simmons"
# Please include the string: [perl #58302]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58302 >
I've attached a file, junctions.p6, which illustrates that binary junctions
treat "
2008/8/24 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Reini Urban wrote:
>>
>> You want one patch only against HEAD? That's easy.
>> But I dislike the idea, as it violates the usage of single tickets.
>
> This is different than the usual case as it's a collection of dependent
> patches that can't be eval
On Sat Aug 23 06:21:57 2008, mmcleric wrote:
>
> Week is over and release has happened, can this be commited?
> I'm asking because I want to get familiar with submitting process and
> move on to sending new and more interesting patches :)
>
Applied in r30521. I'm running coverage analysis to s
Reini Urban wrote:
> 2008/8/23 François Perrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> 2008/8/23 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Moritz Lenz wrote:
On #perl6 somebody just asked if there were up-to-date windows builds of
parrot somewhere, he had googled for 'parrot windows'. The parrotwin32
2008/8/23 François Perrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/8/23 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>>
>>> On #perl6 somebody just asked if there were up-to-date windows builds of
>>> parrot somewhere, he had googled for 'parrot windows'. The parrotwin32
>>> project didn't show up
On Sat May 10 20:22:53 2008, coke wrote:
> This make file isn't preprocessed like the standard root.in: it
> assumes perl is in your path, and redefines the list of OPSFILES.
>
> Let's move the step into the core makefile, and add another
> --maintainer tweak like the one for lex/yacc - either run
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #58306]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58306 >
r30499
This works:
use v6;
my $str = 'foo 0 ) {
if $str ~~ /('')/ {
say
# New Ticket Created by "Stephen Simmons"
# Please include the string: [perl #58294]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58294 >
I wrote a two argument max function, which uses an if/elsif/elsif/else tree;
the th
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #58310]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58310 >
Hello.
Trivial implementation of Str.rindex (depends on #58308)
--
Bacek
commit b
This Smolder report is on the 'newsc' branch.
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/4405
No complaints. No smolder test failures. Resolving ticket.
In a posting to list not in RT, Allison confirmed that 'test_*' files
are being cleaned up properly. So this ticket can be resolved.
2008/8/23 Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Moritz Lenz wrote:
>>
>> On #perl6 somebody just asked if there were up-to-date windows builds of
>> parrot somewhere, he had googled for 'parrot windows'. The parrotwin32
>> project didn't show up in his search (but it's first for 'parrot win32').
>>
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #58312]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58312 >
Rakudo r30499:
my $str = 'foo http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
# New Ticket Created by Vasily Chekalkin
# Please include the string: [perl #58308]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58308 >
Hello.
There is almost copy-pasted version of rindex.
--
Bacek.
commit e23d65f77c
The parrot packages with libparrot0 and libparrot-devel,
plus parrot-perl6 and parrot-languages are updated to 0.7.0-1
for the Cygwin distribution.
This release fixes some minor issues with the languages,
m4 was removed. pipp, tcl, forth and pheme do not work.
Parrot is a virtual machine designe
Reini Urban wrote:
You want one patch only against HEAD? That's easy.
But I dislike the idea, as it violates the usage of single tickets.
This is different than the usual case as it's a collection of dependent
patches that can't be evaluated independently. Splitting them out is
actually more
25 matches
Mail list logo
