2008/3/10 Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:43:58 -0500
>
>
>[oops; continuation 0xb6926320 of type 22 is trying to jump from
>runloop 15008 to runloop 1]
>
>Before I file a bug report on the tcl code that exposes
On Sat Dec 01 10:49:24 2007, coke wrote:
> I don't normally build on windows, but tried today to verify some code
for
> kid51; started by doing a basic build against trunk:
>
> winxp, visual studio 2005, r23314
>
> Build ends with:
>
> ..\..\parrot.exe ..\..\compilers\tge\tgc.pir --output=PO
On Sat Jan 19 21:06:00 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is, surprisingly, the same bug as #49762; Tickets merged.
Friends,
Did this error persist with Parrot 5.3 on ppc/OS X 10.5.1?
kid51
For the record, here's what the tests are doing on Linux as of r26279:
# 'cc -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-E t/src/io_16.o src/parrot_config.o -o
t/src/io_16 -Wl,-rpath=/home/jimk/work/parrot/blib/lib -Lblib/lib
-lparrot -lnsl -ldl -lm -lcrypt -lutil -lpthread -lrt' failed with exit
code 1
# Failed to
From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:43:58 -0500
[oops; continuation 0xb6926320 of type 22 is trying to jump from
runloop 15008 to runloop 1]
Before I file a bug report on the tcl code that exposes this
faux-warning[1], I wanted to double check: Is t
On Sun Feb 24 21:54:31 2008, petergibbs wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Perl6 Internals"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 4:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [perl #51136] [BUG] Segfault in Parrot_Ref_morph
>
>
[oops; continuation 0xb6926320 of type 22 is trying to jump from
runloop 15008 to runloop 1]
Before I file a bug report on the tcl code that exposes this
faux-warning[1], I wanted to double check: Is this an issue anymore
after the recent scheduler/task/event loop fixes? (The warning comes
from sr
On Monday 10 March 2008 14:31:27 Will Coleda wrote:
> I know "replace" is invalid (that's why I marked it with a comment).
> That doesn't stop pmc2c.pl from trying to convert that invocation of
> Parrot_PCCINVOKE when it shouldn't.
The regex is in lib/Parrot/Pmc2c/PCCMETHOD.pm, specifically
rewr
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:04 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008 13:51:40 Will Coleda wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Monday 10 March 2008 13:19:59 Will Coleda wrote:
>
>
> > > > Also, if you're not care
On Monday 10 March 2008 13:51:40 Will Coleda wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 10 March 2008 13:19:59 Will Coleda wrote:
> > > Also, if you're not careful, pmc2c.pl tries to rewrite
> > > Parrot_PCCINVOKE too, not just PCCINVOKE. (I us
On Monday 10 March 2008 13:19:59 Will Coleda wrote:
> Note that:
> > > +STRING* orig,repl;
>
> doesn't DWIM.
That's why abutting the star and the type is an abomination under heaven, and
our style guidelines recommend strongly against it.
> Also, if you're not careful, pmc2c.pl tries t
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:33 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008 13:19:59 Will Coleda wrote:
>
> > Note that:
> > > > +STRING* orig,repl;
> >
> > doesn't DWIM.
>
> That's why abutting the star and the type is an abomination under heaven, and
> our style
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:52 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2008 12:37:50 Will Coleda wrote:
>
> > The conversion of tcllist.pmc to PDD17 isn't complete: there are
> > currently several invocations of String's replace method which in
> > trunk is the old C-style ME
On Monday 10 March 2008 12:37:50 Will Coleda wrote:
> The conversion of tcllist.pmc to PDD17 isn't complete: there are
> currently several invocations of String's replace method which in
> trunk is the old C-style METHOD but in branch, is the new PDD17 style
> METHOD. I tried to replace these, for
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This was mentioned on a ticket, but to add it to this thread: tcl
> > seems to work as well in this branch as it does in trunk now,
> > chromati
François Perrad wrote:
After reverting commit 26097 ([core] Implement does_pmc and ...),
Why revert it? The behavior wasn't quite right, but we fixed it in the
pdd17pmc branch.
The compiler generates :
- a call to VTABLE_neg (in luaany.pmc) when "print(-nil)"
- a call to METHOD len (in
On Monday 10 March 2008 09:43:11 François Perrad wrote:
> After reverting commit 26097 ([core] Implement does_pmc and ...), I see
> a different behavior between trunk and ppd17pmc :
>
> on trunk :
> parrot --no-gc lua.pbc -e "print(-nil)"
> lua.pbc: EVAL_1:30: attempt to perform arithmetic on a ni
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This was mentioned on a ticket, but to add it to this thread: tcl
> seems to work as well in this branch as it does in trunk now,
> chromatic++.
>
> --
> Will "Coke" Coleda
>
Closer inspection shows that partcl is not fa
Will Coleda wrote:
I wanted to call attention to part of today's Parrot Sketch:
- Otherwise, the PMC branch is ready for language testing,
will plan to merge it back into trunk next weekend.
So, language developers (and others); please grab a copy of
https://svn.perl.org/parrot/branches/pdd17p
François Perrad wrote:
I think the problem is in the wmlsbytecode.pmc (a singleton PMC with
only one method 'load'), because the following command has no output :
parrot wmlsd.pir t/examples_1.wmlsc
The script wmlsd.pir is a disassembler that loads a WMLScript bytecode
and dumps it. Other
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2008 02:22:58 François Perrad wrote:
in r26261 with MinGW32, Lua PMCs seem OK (thank to chromatic).
Several tests fail for me, but it looks like a problem with caller() in Lua,
so it's probably beyond my expertise. It looks simpler to fix (if you know
ho
hi,
I'm working on a tutorial for using the PCT (will be published on
parrotblog.org).
For that purpose I built a case study language, which is simple enough
to understand and implement in a straightforward way, yet it has
enough features to demonstrate the power of the PCT. An important
issue in
Everyone jump on board and get all the flags and warnings I've been
enjoying for months now!
Not that I remember exactly what they are. But there ARE some!
xoxo,
Andy
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: March 10, 2008 5:21:34 AM CDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 07 March 2008 02:22:58 François Perrad wrote:
but WMLScript PMCs don't compile :
many error like
.\wmlsinteger.pmc: In function `Parrot_WmlsInteger_subtract_WmlsString':
.\wmlsinteger.pmc:251: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
I fixed all of the compil
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:32 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 07 March 2008 02:22:58 François Perrad wrote:
>
>
> > but WMLScript PMCs don't compile :
> > many error like
> > .\wmlsinteger.pmc: In function `Parrot_WmlsInteger_subtract_WmlsString':
> > .\wmlsinteger.pmc:251:
Parrot Bug Summary
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/NoAuth/parrot/Overview.html
Generated at Mon Mar 10 13:00:02 2008 GMT
---
* Numbers
* New Issues
* Overview of Open Issues
* Ticket Status By Version
* Requestors with m
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:11 PM, James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A developer who recently attended Perl Seminar NY asked me this
> question, to which I didn't have the answer.
>
> > Hi James,
> >
> > Is Parrot embeddable into C programs, like Perl is ?
> >
> >
>
> Can anyone
A developer who recently attended Perl Seminar NY asked me this
question, to which I didn't have the answer.
Hi James,
Is Parrot embeddable into C programs, like Perl is ?
Can anyone advise? Thanks.
jimk
t/src/intlist.c has been passing on Darwin for me (PPC, OS X 10.4.11)
since Feb 19, so I am closing the ticket. Merged #51000 into it,
thereby resolving that ticket as well.
kid51
# New Ticket Created by "Jesse Taylor"
# Please include the string: [perl #51566]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51566 >
I'm having problems understanding what the last two lines in the following
code segmen
I'll merge the pdd17pmc branch back into trunk tomorrow morning, if I
don't hear any show-stoppers by then.
Allison
31 matches
Mail list logo
