On Friday 07 March 2008 02:22:58 François Perrad wrote:
> but WMLScript PMCs don't compile :
> many error like
> .\wmlsinteger.pmc: In function `Parrot_WmlsInteger_subtract_WmlsString':
> .\wmlsinteger.pmc:251: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
I fixed all of the compilation errors
Barney's fixes on March 2 appear to be doing the trick.
t/compilers/imcc/syn/errors.t has been passing for the past week.
AFAICT, there are no tests marked TODO in this file. So I am resolving
the ticket.
Matt Kraai's contributions appear to have resolved the problem.
t/perl/Parrot_Test.t has been passing for me and for reliable
smoke-testers for the past week. So I am resolving this ticket.
kid51
Well, it looks like we've survived for a week without Test::Builder or
any other Perl 5 core module in the Parrot distribution. (Thanks to
Matt Kraai for helping out with t/perl/Parrot_Test.t.) So I think we
can close this ticket.
kid51
Resolved in r26278. It was an alignment problem in the parrot_string_t
struct, triggered by 'Parrot_unmake_COW', when it does a 'memcpy' of the
string's original buffer to the copy's buffer. Fixed by moving the
UINTVAL 'bufused' after the char* 'strstart'.
On Sun Mar 09 01:25:38 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Saturday 08 March 2008 18:22:56 Will Coleda wrote:
>
> > No. {a b} is a string with no interpolation done.
>
> No fair. Did you just go back in time and change Ousterhout's mind about
> that?
>
> I'll keep digging then.
>
> -- c
>
O
On Sunday 09 March 2008 12:02:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: rblasch
> Date: Sun Mar 9 12:02:27 2008
> New Revision: 26272
>
> Modified:
>trunk/t/stm/basic_mt.t
>trunk/t/stm/llqueue.t
>trunk/t/stm/queue.t
>trunk/t/stm/runtime.t
>
> Log:
> [t] Enabled STM tests again on Cygw
From: Klaas-Jan Stol (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:43:02 -0700
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
# Please include the string: [perl #51560]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Displ
From: James E Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:25:21 -0400
James E Keenan wrote:
The title and description I provided for this proposal is as follows:
###
Parrot and Perl 6 Workshop
. . .
###
Feedback welcome -- particularly if i
All tests pass at r26264 on VC++ 9.0 and MinGW 3.4.2. This was fixed
with commit r19068. Closing this ticket.
$ prove -v t\pmc\env.t
t\pmc\env..
1..13
ok 1 - all Envs are ident
ok 2 - getenv
ok 3 - setenv/getenv
ok 4 - envs are all the same
ok 5 - gone/delete
ok 6 - iterate
ok 7 - exists/del
I would like to use Parrot on an embedded microprocessor system. It needs a
minimal parrot that should only run precompiled bytecode, nothing else, and
it does not even need the PGE (eventually, it would need JIT for PowerPC or
MicroBlaze).
But it should be very small (say <250K). I compiled parrot
James E Keenan wrote:
3. YAPC is trying out a new format for some time slots this year. Josh
McAdams writes on use.perl.org:
"This year we are also planning on introducing more hands-on
workshop-style tracks to the conference. These sessions will typically
be a little longer than a norma
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
# Please include the string: [perl #51560]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51560 >
hi,
when running a language in interactive mode, and you declare a local
variable, th
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:25 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 March 2008 18:22:56 Will Coleda wrote:
>
> > No. {a b} is a string with no interpolation done.
Well, yeah, it's a string - but with a whole library of functions that
will treat it as a list. It's kind of like
chromatic wrote:
On Saturday 08 March 2008 07:31:08 Ron Blaschke wrote:
I've been looking into a failure of F on Windows,
but I don't think the problem is limited to that platform.
$ prove t\dynoplibs\myops.t
t\dynoplibs\myops..5/10
t\dynoplibs\myops..6/10 # Failed test 'three alarm'
James E Keenan wrote:
Ron Blaschke wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking into a failure of F on Windows,
but I don't think the problem is limited to that platform.
$ prove t\dynoplibs\myops.t
t\dynoplibs\myops..5/10
t\dynoplibs\myops..6/10 # Failed test 'three alarm'
# at t\dynoplibs\myop
On Saturday 08 March 2008 18:22:56 Will Coleda wrote:
> No. {a b} is a string with no interpolation done.
No fair. Did you just go back in time and change Ousterhout's mind about
that?
I'll keep digging then.
-- c
17 matches
Mail list logo
