While we're at it, how about the horror of delete_ins() being told
whether it should be freeing its argument?
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
On Feb 4, 2008, at 12:44 AM, chromatic wrote:
SymReg * r = _get_sym_typed(hsh, name, t);
if (r) {
free(name);
return r;
}
It's really saying "If I don't need a copy, then free what I assume is
a copy", rather than "If I need a copy,
IMCC has a fair few memory leaks, and most of them come (eventually) from
calls to str_dup().
Why are there so many calls to str_dup()? Look in compilers/imcc/symreg.c at
_mk_symreg(). This function takes a parameter, char *name. Here's the funny
part:
SymReg * r = _get_sym_typed(hs
Author: kjs
Date: Sun Feb 3 10:49:02 2008
New Revision: 25478
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd26_ast.pod
Log:
[pdd26] add description of :scope('attribute')
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd26_ast.pod
==
--- trunk/docs/pdds
From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 13:51:05 -0800
On Sunday 03 February 2008 11:15:38 Bob Rogers wrote:
> The first 3/4 of this should get fleshed out and added to the docs,
> which I'd be happy to do. Is docs/running.pod a good place?
A few bits may be
# New Ticket Created by Zev Benjamin
# Please include the string: [perl #50520]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50520 >
See attached.
Zev
Index: t/26-method_ops.t
===
# New Ticket Created by Bob Rogers
# Please include the string: [perl #50518]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50518 >
I notice that config/gen/makefiles/root.in has the following target:
rpms : re
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
# Please include the string: [perl #50508]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50508 >
hi,
earlier today I sent a proposal to add a :scope type ('attribute') to
PAST::Var n
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
# Please include the string: [perl #50500]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50500 >
PAST::Var nodes have a required attribute :scope, which can take one of the
following
On Sunday 03 February 2008 11:15:38 Bob Rogers wrote:
> The first 3/4 of this should get fleshed out and added to the docs,
> which I'd be happy to do. Is docs/running.pod a good place?
A few bits may be technical enough to belong under docs/dev/ somewhere, but
docs/running.pod is definitely a
From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:03:12 -0800
On Friday 25 January 2008 07:46:32 Andy Lester wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:16 AM, chromatic wrote:
> > Did you test this with make testC and make testj?
> I'm unaware of testC and testj. So no.
Ok
I just popped in my mind that this really looks like some kind of "with"
statement semantics, which some languages have.
Maybe it's worthwhile to have a PAST::Op( :pasttype('with') ) node, where
the first child evaluates to some object, on which the 2nd..nth children are
operating.
Not sure if th
On Saturday 02 February 2008 22:41:03 chromatic wrote:
> Second, we need a way to know the proper initialization order of PMC
> vtables such that we handle all parents before all children. Making this
> work for core PMCs is fairly easy. Making it work for dynpmcs is a little
> more difficult, b
# New Ticket Created by Stephen Weeks
# Please include the string: [perl #50492]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50492 >
Add support for parameters to functions, as in:
HOW DO I dostuff YR bar AN YR baz
This patch causes test failures due to its lack of support for varargs
functions and special handling of VISIBLE. It's probably best not to
apply this patch yet.
15 matches
Mail list logo
