Re: [perl #50056] [BUG] "Undefined symbols" on OS X

2008-01-29 Thread Allison Randal
James Keenan via RT wrote: [...] However, the spewing problem occured at auto::readline -- one step *before* the first superfluous addition of a flag. Okay, so (summarizing) at the point of running auto::readline, -L/sw/lib and -I/sw/include are all set appropriately. Does C_LIBS have -lread

[perl #50390] [BUG]: Parrot::Configure::Step::Methods::_handle_darwin_for_fink adding superfluous flags

2008-01-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Tue Jan 29 18:14:48 2008, coke wrote: > > Would it make sense to make this the default behavior to > $conf->data->add, or perhaps add another add* variant? > > The same thought occurred to me while I was eating my broccoli! Great minds ... However ... (a) To do it right, someone would ha

Re: [perl #50390] [BUG]: Parrot::Configure::Step::Methods::_handle_darwin_for_fink adding superfluous flags

2008-01-29 Thread Will Coleda
On Jan 29, 2008 9:08 PM, via RT James Keenan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by James Keenan > # Please include the string: [perl #50390] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50390 > > > > In the

[perl #50056] [BUG] "Undefined symbols" on OS X

2008-01-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
I just sent off a patch for the duplicate flags problem; it will appear in a separate RT and I'll commit it to trunk in a day if there is no objection. However, it did *not* fix the spewing problem with auto::readline. Here's my latest configuration log. This was run with both Allison's patch t

[perl #50390] [BUG]: Parrot::Configure::Step::Methods::_handle_darwin_for_fink adding superfluous flags

2008-01-29 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan # Please include the string: [perl #50390] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50390 > In the course of research on http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/ Display.html?id=50056 tonig

[perl #50056] [BUG] "Undefined symbols" on OS X

2008-01-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
I see that I misread your post; 'ldflags' should have included -L/sw/lib, and it does. Here's the evolution of 'ccflags' in the same region: { 'auto::aio' => '-fno-common -no-cpp-precomp -pipe -I/usr/local/include -pipe -fno-common -Wno-long-double -DHASATTRIBUTE_CONST -DHASATTRIBUTE_DEPRE

[perl #50056] [BUG] "Undefined symbols" on OS X

2008-01-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
On Tue Jan 29 16:40:22 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The spewing in auto::readline is caused by it failing to detect readline > from Fink. > > In the generated Makefile, both LINKFLAGS and LDFLAGS should include the > entry "-L/sw/lib" and CFLAGS should include the entry "-I/sw/include".

[perl #50380] [TODO]: override Test::Harness summary method to provide better-looking test result summary

2008-01-29 Thread James Keenan via RT
particle: I was wondering why my reports started looking different lately! It's interesting that what you typed below was represented one way in my webmail and news readers ("Failed tests" indented many spaces to vertically align with "(Wstat") and a different way on RT (everything flush left on

Re: [perl #50056] [BUG] "Undefined symbols" on OS X

2008-01-29 Thread Allison Randal
James Keenan via RT wrote: Note the spewing during auto::readline; never had that before. Note further that this failed to detect that I have readline installed via Fink. Whazzup with that? The spewing in auto::readline is caused by it failing to detect readline from Fink. In the generate

[perl #50380] [TODO]: override Test::Harness summary method to provide better-looking test result summary

2008-01-29 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay # Please include the string: [perl #50380] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50380 > test::harness 3 is wonderful, except where it's rough around the edges. in particular, the

[perl #50212] Configure step fails on Windows

2008-01-29 Thread Mark Glines via RT
On Fri Jan 25 15:10:50 2008, ajr wrote: > > Hi, Alan! What kind of CPU do you have? If you have an AMD Athlon XP > > (or something of similar lineage), I think I know what the problem is. > > > I think you've nailed it: Athlon XP-M. Hi, I have built and sent an updated libgmp.a to the Strawberr

Re: [PCT] PAST nodes for goto and friends, labels.

2008-01-29 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
On Jan 24, 2008 5:45 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 12:24:37PM +0100, Klaas-Jan Stol wrote: > > as far as I could tell there's no support for goto statements in PCT > (that > > is, special nodes or something). > > I don't know whether there are any plan