# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #50046]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50046 >
pir_source_files in Parrot::Distribution is only looking for *.pir
files: this skips all
Spent some more time trying to track this down. On OSX/86, I was able to
reproduce the
segfault with much less tcl code:
%cat foo.tcl
after 10
%./tclsh foo.tcl
if I ran:
%../../parrot -G tcl.pbc foo.tcl
The segfault goes away, which smells like a GC issue.
However, I can't duplicate it with
Author: pmichaud
Date: Sun Jan 20 21:23:36 2008
New Revision: 14492
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S29.pod
Log:
Update location of S29 to point to new repositories
(the old openfoundry.org address is way out of date).
Reported by diakopter++ .
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S29.pod
=
Ovid wrote:
> If I call this:
>
> if $class.^can('wibble') { ... }
>
> Does Perl 6 return false if that's only an instance method? Will the
> WALK iterator returned by .^can return references to instance methods?
As I understand it, Perl 6 generally doesn't bother with the
class-vs-instance dis
On Fri Jan 11 13:25:21 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed Feb 21 05:47:29 2007, kjs wrote:
> > On Wed May 24 05:26:22 2006, coke wrote:
> > > New addmethod opcode needs tests.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Will "Coke" Coleda
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > Attached a patch that adds a test f
On Jan 19, 2008 10:28 PM, via RT chromatic
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because this patch is large and in charge, I'd like to hear some success
> reports from a couple of non-x86 and non-Linux platforms before I commit it.
>
> -- c
osx/x86 has no new failures with this patch applied.
--
Will "C
On Jan 20, 2008 10:33 AM, Paul Cochrane via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this patch is ok, please say so, otherwise I'll apply it in three days.
Mission Control: Buckaroo, The White House wants to know is everything
OK with the alien space craft from Planet 10 or should we just go
ahead and
On Sun Jan 20 08:57:52 2008, ptc wrote:
> Completed as per r25053.
The ticket is for removing the ability to do this, not merely removing the
instances where it is
done.
Re-opening ticket; Thanks for all the cleanup work, however, that should make
it easier to rip
out the actual code.
[Oops, I meant this to go to perl6-compiler. --Pm]
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 01:33:30PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +.sub keys :multi('List')
> + .param pmc list
> + .local pmc res
> +
> + res = list.'keys'()
> +
> + .return(res)
> +.end
Better is to use a tailcall:
.sub 'keys' :mul
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 03:34:33PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> test = exists self[ind]
> if test == 0 goto false
>true:
> res = get_hll_global ['Bool'], 'True'
> goto done
>false:
> res = get_hll_global ['Bool'], 'False'
> goto done
>done:
> .ret
On Sun Jan 20 13:17:03 2008, coke wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 10:27 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 January 2008 19:20:22 Will Coleda via RT wrote:
> >
> > > Original command line has a slight red herring: the duplicated
> file name is
> > > irrelevant:
> > >
> > > ./tclsh
On Sun Jan 20 19:15:49 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It'll fail everywhere; the culprit is r25029.
>
... and that revision was the fix proposed for RT 50010.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:36:37PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified: trunk/languages/perl6/src/builtins/list.pir
> [...]
> Modified: trunk/languages/perl6/src/classes/List.pir
FWIW, I think that the both the method version and the global
subroutine wrapper should be placed in classes/Lis
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 03:06:34PM -0800, jerry gay wrote:
>
> looks to me like the 'clean' target in the makefile should delete the
> t/spec directory (it doesn't currently.)
I don't think that 'make clean' should remove t/spec. Because we now
grab t/spec via 'svn co', someone might have local
On Sunday 20 January 2008 19:04:12 James Keenan wrote:
> Failed at r25076. Here's the output of 'prove -v' on i386-inux. I
> got similar failures on ppc-darwin. AFAICT, these developed in last
> 24 hours.
It'll fail everywhere; the culprit is r25029.
These headers and declarations are messy.
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #50038]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50038 >
Failed at r25076. Here's the output of 'prove -v' on i386-inux. I
got similar failur
On Jan 20, 2008, at 5:48 AM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Sat Jan 19 21:05:32 2008, petdance wrote:
On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:59 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Occurs on Darwin as well: r25026.
This should be OK now. I fixed the prototype.
Yes, make is now passing on both Linux and Darwi
Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
On Sat Jan 12 04:42:26 2008, allison wrote:
This opcode has been superseded by 'inspect'.
The pmcinfo opcode is removed by the attached patch. I would have
committed this directly however, I'm not 100% sure that removing the:
'Class PMCs also have the "I am a class
Latest changes below. As always, your contributions are solicited. (You can
send me info if you don't have time to add it yourself.)
>> New:
"Perl 6 Marketplace" (for products, services, training, off-wiki job info)
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6/index.cgi?perl_6_marketplace
"Perl 6 Books a
On Jan 20, 2008 1:23 PM, via RT Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
> # Please include the string: [perl #50032]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50032 >
>
>
> in langu
I've launched the GC PDD out of draft. Comments and suggestions welcome.
Allison
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #50032]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50032 >
in languages/perl6/ the command "make spectest" complains about
util/fudgeall which can't
From my journal:
I'm pleased to announce that after 2 years of hiatus and 6 months of
coding, mod_parrot 0.4 has been released. It's been worth the wait, as we
now have working mod_perl6 and PHP proof-of-concepts, per-vhost
interpreter pools, the framework for a more comprehensive test suite,
Sorry, finger trouble with the mailer lost the attachment. I will try
again later.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com
Author: allison
Date: Sun Jan 20 12:52:42 2008
New Revision: 25069
Added:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd09_gc.pod
- copied unchanged from r25067, /trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd09_gc.pod
Removed:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd09_gc.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/MANIF
On Jan 19, 2008 10:27 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 19 January 2008 19:20:22 Will Coleda via RT wrote:
>
> > Original command line has a slight red herring: the duplicated file name is
> > irrelevant:
> >
> > ./tclsh t/cmd_after.t
> >
> > causes the same issue. (chromatic++
Author: allison
Date: Sun Jan 20 12:43:51 2008
New Revision: 25067
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd09_gc.pod
Log:
[pdd] A full rehash of the GC PDD.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd09_gc.pod
==
--- trunk/docs/p
If I call this:
if $class.^can('wibble') { ... }
Does Perl 6 return false if that's only an instance method? Will the
WALK iterator returned by .^can return references to instance methods?
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Perl and CGI - http://users.ea
Alan,
> The attached patch should quieten some of the grumbling. It's entirely
> comments, so should not have any functional impact.
The patch wasn't attached. Could you try again?
Thanks,
Paul
The attached patch should quieten some of the grumbling. It's entirely
comments, so should not have any functional impact.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com
Completed as per r25053.
On Sat Jan 12 04:42:26 2008, allison wrote:
> This opcode has been superseded by 'inspect'.
The pmcinfo opcode is removed by the attached patch. I would have
committed this directly however, I'm not 100% sure that removing the:
'Class PMCs also have the "I am a class" flag set on them.'
test was
On Tue Dec 04 20:12:24 2007, coke wrote:
> From PDD17:
>
> =item class_type
>
>INTVAL class_type(INTERP, PMC* self)
>
> Return the integer type of the PMC. [NOTE: will be deprecated when type
> IDs are deprecated.]
The attached patch removes this vtable entry. The only thing still
which s
Thanks for the ticket.
Updated README (r25035) to point to a section in submissions.pod which serves a
similar
purpose to the missing documention.
On Sat Jan 19 21:05:32 2008, petdance wrote:
>
> On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:59 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> > Occurs on Darwin as well: r25026.
>
> This should be OK now. I fixed the prototype.
>
Yes, make is now passing on both Linux and Darwin. Thanks.
Author: simon
Date: Sat Jan 19 21:55:18 2008
New Revision: 25030
Added:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd28_character_sets.pod (contents, props changed)
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/MANIFEST
trunk/MANIFEST.SKIP
Log:
[docs] A start on the charsets PDD. Will wri
binuwGK8zseFj.bin
Description:
chromatic wrote:
Here's my crazy idea.
When you register a callback into PIR from C, you need to pass a few
arguments: the interpreter into which to call, the PMC Sub to call, and the C
signature of the C function which gets called from C.
I presume that the PIR function will get called thro
chromatic wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008 20:25:16 Allison Randal wrote:
It's true that the generalized solution for varying callback signatures
doesn't exist yet, but it's easy enough to create your own C callback
layer, with a separate C function for each callback you need. (Note, not
one-pe
39 matches
Mail list logo
