http://use.perl.org/~pmichaud/journal/35272
http://perlbuzz.com/2008/01/flurry-of-perl-6-activity-picks-up-new-contributor.html
Lots of cool stuff is going on, and I'm so so glad to see it. I'm
thinking of making a Perl 6-specific column in Perlbuzz, because I'd
like to have a one-stop shop
I would like to get unsubscribed from this list. Please help me.
Thanks & Regards,
Thomas Reddy A
"The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know"
-Original Message-
From: Patrick R. Michaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 12:05 PM
To: Bob Rogers
Cc:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 09:40:23PM -0500, Bob Rogers wrote:
>From: "Patrick R. Michaud via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:29:35 -0800
>
>On Wed Jun 20 16:23:40 2007, pmichaud wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:08:33AM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
>>
Author: larry
Date: Thu Jan 3 19:42:19 2008
New Revision: 14480
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
Log:
Typo from Smylers++
More clarification of assignment semantics in terms of underlying binding
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
==
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #49364]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49364 >
The Parrot configuration step classes (config/*/*.pm) each have an
initializer routine
Dave Whipp wrote:
I was reading Synopsis 4 with regards to multi core programming. It
seems to be infused with a bias towards non-parallel models of
computation. Concurrently appears to be an add-on feature -- whereas
we should have a mindset that explicit sequential constraints are the
add-on
From: Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 19:15:40 +0200
Bob Rogers wrote:
> Thought so. I ask because Common Lisp has provision for anonymous
> classes, and I was wondering how I might support that some day. But my
> interest is just academic curiosity a
From: "Patrick R. Michaud via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:29:35 -0800
On Wed Jun 20 16:23:40 2007, pmichaud wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:08:33AM +0100, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
> >
> > Currently HLL debug info stuff is spec'd, but not implemented.
The test file itself has not been substantively changed in several
months, so it's not the test itself that's causing the problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Modified:
>doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
>
> Log:
> Clarification of autovivification semantics in terms of protoobjects
>
> -my $obj = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; # $obj is a Capture object - see S02
> +my $cap = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; # $obj is a Capture object - see
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #49356]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49356 >
[li11-226:parrot] 502 $ prove -v t/stm/basic_mt.t
t/stm/basic_mt1..4
ok 1 - wait (si
On Sat Dec 29 09:14:40 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If there is no objection, I will apply this to trunk within a week.
No one objected, so I applied this patch to trunk in r24517.
Applied a combination of Andy's patch and mine in r24516.
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:55:24PM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
: On Jan 3, 2008 6:36 PM, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:28:54AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: > : Paul Hodges wrote:
: > : > http://perl6.org/doc/design/syn/S02.html still says:
: > : > "Intra-line
Author: larry
Date: Thu Jan 3 16:15:39 2008
New Revision: 14479
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
Log:
Clarification of autovivification semantics in terms of protoobjects
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
===
chromatic wrote:
On Thursday 03 January 2008 12:05:48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
Add copyright statement to file which lacked it; t/codingstd/copyright.t
should once again pass.
Modified: trunk/languages/lolcode/src/parser/actions.pm
=
jerry gay skribis 2007-12-28 6:46 (-0800):
> if we had a smoke machine (e.g. feather.perl6.nl) that frequently
> built the various implementations (pugs, kp6, perl6,) ran the perl 6
> test suite against each implementation, and posted color-coded
> tabulated html results, it would offer a way for
--- Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Hodges wrote:
> > http://perl6.org/doc/design/syn/S02.html still says:
> > "Intra-line comments will not be supported in standard Perl"
>
> This is wrong, since S02 also defines intra-line comments, under
> "Whitespace and Comments". It calls
"Scalable Locality-Conscious Multithreaded Memory Allocation"
http://people.cs.vt.edu/~scschnei/papers/ismm06.pdf
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:39:54PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> On Thursday 03 January 2008 12:05:48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -# Copyright (c) 2007, The Perl Foundation
> > +# Copyright (C) 2001-2008, The Perl Foundation.
> > # $Id$
>
> I'm not sure this is legal. Certainly TPF holds a copyrigh
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> (Neglected to CC to list first time through.)
>
> Can you try this patch?
Oops. Crossed in the mail. I just sent a much simpler version in. At a
glance, yours should also work, so I guess it really doesn't matter.
--
Andy Dougherty
> Here's the output of Configure.pl --verbose on a SPARC where the required
> alignment is 4. The test correctly deduces that alignments of 64, 32, 16,
> 8, and 4 all work, but apparently throws that information away when the 2
> and 1 byte alignment tests fail.
And here's a simple patch to f
On Thu Jan 03 04:57:22 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The difference here is that you can only generate Debian packages on a
> Debian-based system, so portability to non-Linux systems isn't a concern.
>
D'oh. My oversight.
(Neglected to CC to list first time through.)
Can you try this patch?
diff.alignptrs.pm
Description: Perl program
On Thursday 03 January 2008 12:05:48 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Log:
> Add copyright statement to file which lacked it; t/codingstd/copyright.t
> should once again pass.
>
> Modified: trunk/languages/lolcode/src/parser/actions.pm
> ==
On 2008-01-03 Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perl 5 couldn't really solve this and programmers just had to "know"
> that all methods were implicitly variadic. I seem to recall that
> Larry had an idea about how to specify a signature (I could be
> misremembering and I can't find the response).
> James E Keenan wrote:
>>
>> For portability reasons, however, shouldn't it be converted to Perl 5?
>
> The difference here is that you can only generate Debian packages on a
> Debian-based system, so portability to non-Linux systems isn't a concern.
>
That was my assumption. (Along with the need
just a small question, what speak against this construct:
$min, $max = @a.minmax;
On Jan 3, 2008 6:36 PM, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:28:54AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
> : Paul Hodges wrote:
> : > http://perl6.org/doc/design/syn/S02.html still says:
> : > "Intra-line comments will not be supported in standard Perl"
> Note that the docum
I don't know if this was considered a non-issue when I last raised it,
but in this synopsis:
http://dev.perl.org/perl6/doc/design/syn/S12.html
I see that the behavior of .can() metamethod hasn't been updated. My
concern is that someone calls $object.can('bark') and they expect to
pass an integ
Moritz Lenz wrote:
You can achieve that with the "hyper" list-op (see S02).
Also note that an optimizer is free to automatically add the "hyper"
list op if it can prove that the executed block has no side effects.
Yes, there are some places where things are better than others, which is
why I
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 11:28:54AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Paul Hodges wrote:
: > http://perl6.org/doc/design/syn/S02.html still says:
: > "Intra-line comments will not be supported in standard Perl"
:
: This is wrong, since S02 also defines intra-line comments, under
: "Whitespace and Comm
On Jan 2, 2008 3:51 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2008 08:39:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Modified:
> >trunk/languages/perl6/ (props changed)
> >trunk/languages/perl6/config/makefiles/root.in
> >
> > Log:
> > [perl6]
> > - add suffixe .exe on Win3
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, James E Keenan wrote:
> Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > After fixing various minor little things, here's where I stand
> > on Solaris 8/SPARC after the recent changes.
> >
> > Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
> >
> >
James E Keenan wrote:
For portability reasons, however, shouldn't it be converted to Perl 5? I
don't think we proceed on the assumption that all our target OSes can
handle shell.
The difference here is that you can only generate Debian packages on a
Debian-based system, so portability to no
Allison Randal wrote:
Alan Rocker wrote:
I've attached a quickie shell script, in case that's what you want.
It's a
naive little thing, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.
Good start. Committed in r24479, with a small change to run it from the
top-level directory instead of tool
"Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:Howeven, "returns a Failure object" in this context (autodecrement)
:still seems a bit ambiguous, because the return values of autoincrement
:and autodecrement are often ignored, as in:
:
:my $s = 'A00';
:$s--;
:say $s;
:
:So, what happen
Alan Rocker wrote:
I've attached a quickie shell script, in case that's what you want. It's a
naive little thing, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.
Good start. Committed in r24479, with a small change to run it from the
top-level directory instead of tools/dev. A little extra po
On 02/01/2008, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @*ARGS and infix:// have been implemented in perl6 thanks to patrick,
> so hanoi.pl works with the svn head in parrot repo.
Yup - hanoi page on the wiki has been updated to reflect that.
I plan to try a few more programs out on the next monthl
# New Ticket Created by François PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #49328]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49328 >
I've isolated one problem between PBC loading and garbage collection.
(remember: on
On Mer. 02 Gen. 2008 05:40:32, cosimo wrote:
> On Lun. 31 Dic. 2007 01:09:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 December 2007 14:05:38 Cosimo Streppone wrote:
> >
> > > I tried to follow chromatic's instructions to obtain a perl6
binary
> > > but had some problems [...]
> > [...]
>
> Th
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #49316]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49316 >
Although include/parrot/dynext.h says that the third argument of
Parrot_init_lib is n
>
> A quick cage cleaner task. Create a script to generate the file
> ports/debian/parrot-doc.docs
I've attached a quickie shell script, in case that's what you want. It's a
naive little thing, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.
A properly formatted and tested Perl script will take
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #49314]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49314 >
In order to get pbc_to_exe to work with the Solaris linker, I had to move
the librari
At 5:22 PM -0800 1/2/08, Dave Whipp wrote:
I was reading Synopsis 4 with regards to multi core programming. It
seems to be infused with a bias towards non-parallel models of
computation. Concurrently appears to be an add-on feature -- whereas
we should have a mindset that explicit sequential co
Dave Whipp wrote:
> I was reading Synopsis 4 with regards to multi core programming. It
> seems to be infused with a bias towards non-parallel models of
> computation. Concurrently appears to be an add-on feature -- whereas we
> should have a mindset that explicit sequential constraints are the
On Lun. 31 Dic. 2007 01:09:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sunday 30 December 2007 14:05:38 Cosimo Streppone wrote:
>
> > I tried to follow chromatic's instructions to obtain a perl6 binary
> > but had some problems [...]
>
> > 3) In the final generated "pbc_to_exe.c" and
> "languages\perl6\per
While trying to understand Parrot::Vtables.pm, I came across what seems
to be some "zombie" code, possibly left after RT 48877.
1. Two references to src/pmc/null.pl, which does not appear to exist.
2. The method "vtbl_embed", which is used only in
parrot/tools/build/vtable_extend.pl That writes
i
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #49308]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49308 >
Here's the output of Configure.pl --verbose on a SPARC where the required
alignment i
# New Ticket Created by Andy Lester
# Please include the string: [perl #49310]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=49310 >
Syntax checking of perl6 programs is crucial.
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www
Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
> The recent perl6 brouhaha got me to try out pugs again.
>
> After grabbing pugs from svn and running the smoke tests
> (http://xrl.us/bdipe), I noticed some ext/File-Util/t/03.dirs.t was
> failing and looked like it would be a relatively easy fix.
>
> Diff attached.
51 matches
Mail list logo
