On Nov 29, 2007, at 10:13 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Also, in case it matters, I'm on x86 (32-bit) for this.
Pm
Does it still occur after `ccache -C`? Since ccache uses md5, there's
always the possibility you inadvertently discovered a collision in md5.
Might want to back up ~/.ccac
On Friday 07 December 2007 18:09:57 Joshua Juran wrote:
> On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:57 PM, chromatic wrote:
> > Everything looks reasonable to me, except q{} versus q{ } which are
> > barely discernable and offers (to my mind) only disadvantages over ''
> > versus ' ' which is much more distinguishable
On Friday 07 December 2007 05:23:39 Allison Randal wrote:
> I'm about to turn on the concurrency scheduler runloop in Parrot trunk.
> Before I do, I'd like test results on as many platforms as possible
> (especially Windows, since it doesn't use POSIX threads).
>
> To test it, edit src/inter_create
On Dec 5, 2007, at 5:57 PM, chromatic wrote:
Everything looks reasonable to me, except q{} versus q{ } which are
barely
discernable and offers (to my mind) only disadvantages over ''
versus ' '
which is much more distinguishable.
Would "" vs. " " be a further improvement?
Josh
I do think It Would Be Nice If there were a native Perl6
DRY/MVC/OMG/WTF/BBQ webapp dev framework ready to go (go where? into a
webapp-oriented P6 distro, natch) around the same time that the lang
itself is done.
I imagine a port of Catalyst would fit the bill nicely.
I mention this only because I
> @@ -264,17 +264,34 @@
> The C<.next> and C<.last> methods take an optional argument giving
> the final value of that loop iteration. So the old C
> syntax is still allowed but is really short for C using
> -indirect object syntax.
> +indirect object syntax. Any block object can be used, not
Author: larry
Date: Fri Dec 7 16:58:49 2007
New Revision: 14473
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
More loop control tweakage.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
==
--- doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
> @@ -260,6 +260,11 @@
> @evens = ($_ * 2 if .odd for 0..100);
>
> Loop modifiers C, C, and C also work as in Perl5.
> +However, the labelled forms use method call syntax: C, etc.
> +The C<.next> and C<.last> methods take an optional argument giving
> +the final value of that loop iteration.
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 11:25:14PM +, Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 7 Dec 2007, at 23:19, Chas. Owens wrote:
>> That is my take on it: "Everything is bigger in Texas", even French
>> Quotes.
>
>
> You know, from a complete outsider's perspective, I really prefer the
> Paris, Texas explanation :)
Author: larry
Date: Fri Dec 7 15:26:16 2007
New Revision: 14472
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
Log:
Some clarification of break semantics requested by dataweaver++
Generalize next, last, and break to use LABEL.leave($retval) syntax.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
===
On 7 Dec 2007, at 23:19, Chas. Owens wrote:
That is my take on it: "Everything is bigger in Texas", even French
Quotes.
You know, from a complete outsider's perspective, I really prefer the
Paris, Texas explanation :)
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On Dec 7, 2007 5:46 PM, Thom Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
> But, back to Perl I didn't get an answer to my follow-up question:
>
> So, it's because <> is so much bigger than «this», "this", or 'this'?
snip
That is my take on it: "Everything is bigger in Texas", even French Quotes.
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:47:05AM +0100, Juerd Waalboer wrote:
: Jonathan Lang skribis 2007-12-06 16:36 (-0800):
: > > I know it used to be that way back near the Dawn of Time, but methods
: > > don't automatically topicalize anymore unless you explicitly name
: > > one of the parameters '$_':
: >
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 04:36:26PM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Larry Wall wrote:
: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:40:10AM -0800, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: > : or (I think):
: > :
: > : method test ($value) {
: > : setup();
: > : when $value { doit() } #[smart-match the calling object $_ agai
On Dec 7, 2007 11:50 AM, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:12:36PM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
> > Larry Wall wrote:
> >> Good guess, but no. It comes from the fact that Texas always bragged
> >> about how they were the largest state in the union, and had the biggest
Andy Dougherty wrote:
Whether this is a defect in the vtables_4 test sourcefile for failing to
initialize the vtables, or whether pmc_new ought to be more defensive, I
can't say.
Looks like a bug in the test, as there are other things in Parrot_exit
that won't behave appropriately without an
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Allison Randal wrote:
> I'm about to turn on the concurrency scheduler runloop in Parrot trunk. Before
> I do, I'd like test results on as many platforms as possible (especially
> Windows, since it doesn't use POSIX threads).
>
> To test it, edit src/inter_create.c and uncomme
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:45:03PM +0200, Allison Randal wrote:
> jerry gay wrote:
> >>
> >looks good to me. commit away!
> >nice work.
>
> I've got a clean report on our core platform targets, so committed in
> r23574. As usual, please report any issues.
r23574 gives me failures in t/src/vtable
Author: pmichaud
Date: Fri Dec 7 11:10:06 2007
New Revision: 23575
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod
Log:
[docs]:
* Note non-working code in pdd23, reference RT#48320.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod
===
jerry gay wrote:
looks good to me. commit away!
nice work.
I've got a clean report on our core platform targets, so committed in
r23574. As usual, please report any issues.
Thanks!
Allison
On Dec 7, 2007 5:23 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm about to turn on the concurrency scheduler runloop in Parrot trunk.
> Before I do, I'd like test results on as many platforms as possible
> (especially Windows, since it doesn't use POSIX threads).
>
> To test it, edit src/inte
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 12:12:36PM -0700, Thom Boyer wrote:
> Larry Wall wrote:
>> Good guess, but no. It comes from the fact that Texas always bragged
>> about how they were the largest state in the union, and had the biggest
>> everything, including ten-gallon hats. That was before we added Ala
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #48320]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48320 >
At the bottom of pdd23 there's an example of creating
and throwing an exception th
I'm about to turn on the concurrency scheduler runloop in Parrot trunk.
Before I do, I'd like test results on as many platforms as possible
(especially Windows, since it doesn't use POSIX threads).
To test it, edit src/inter_create.c and uncomment the two lines that
start with 'Parrot_cx...".
On Fri Dec 07 05:10:15 2007, coke wrote:
> From PDD22:
>
> C retrieves the UNIX integer file descriptor of a stream object.
> The opcode has been replaced by a 'get_fd' method on the ParrotIO
> object.
>
> --
>
> This ticket is to track the creation of the get_fd method.
Also from PDD22:
Author: coke
Date: Fri Dec 7 05:15:47 2007
New Revision: 23568
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/DEPRECATED.pod
Log:
[docs] Open two tickets to track the deprecation of one item and the feature
that is replacing it
Modif
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #48312]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48312 >
From PDD22:
C retrieves the UNIX integer file descriptor of a stream object.
The opcod
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #48310]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48310 >
From PDD22:
C retrieves the UNIX integer file descriptor of a stream object.
The opcod
Author: coke
Date: Fri Dec 7 05:05:56 2007
New Revision: 23567
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod
Log:
[docs] Remove reference to "will-be-deprecated" opcode from pdd which was
apparently already removed.
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/pdd22_io.pod
==
Andrew Shitov wrote:
I have no personal web site, so I create the project parrotwin32 on
sourceforge : http://parrotwin32.sourceforge.net/
Cool, and I also promoted it at http://perl6.ru/parrotwin32/.
But an attempt to run perl6.pbc faied:
C:\Program Files\parrot-0.5.0-devel>"bin/parrot.exe"
30 matches
Mail list logo
