On Wed Aug 15 08:20:35 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I was pondering a suitable value for YetToBeNamed when the thought
> occurred to me:
>
> What would be the consequences of bundling useful CPAN modules into the
> Parrot package, such as File::Slurp in the lib subdirectory?
>
See http:/
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 16:30:39 Colin Kuskie wrote:
> Change all instances of .Class to 'Class' in t/op/*.t
>
> Also, I found a new form that may have been missed in earlier patches. I
> ack'ed for these:
>
> ack --perl -l '=\s+new\s+\.\w+' ./t
>
> which misses the form:
>
> new $P0, .Class
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44671]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44671 >
The attached patch changes the deprecated .Class syntax to the more modern
'Class'.
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44677]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44677 >
Change .Class to 'Class' in t/compilers/tge
Index: t/compilers/tge/ba
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44681]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44681 >
Change t/examples/streams.t to change .Class to 'Class'. Note, this also
required chan
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44673]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44673 >
This patch changes the old deprecated .Class to 'Class' for t/compilers/json
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44679]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44679 >
Change .Class to 'Class' in dynpmc/*.t
Index: t/dynpmc/dynlexpad.t
==
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #44657]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44657 >
I was pondering a suitable value for YetToBeNamed when the thought
occurred to me:
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44685]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44685 >
In t/oo/*.t, change .Class to 'Class'
Index: t/oo/mro-c3.t
==
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44683]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44683 >
In t/library/*.t, change .Class to the newer 'Class'
Index: t/library
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44687]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44687 >
Change all instances of .Class to 'Class' in t/op/*.t
Also, I found a new form that may
# New Ticket Created by Colin Kuskie
# Please include the string: [perl #44675]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44675 >
Change .Class to 'Class' in t/compilers/pge
Index: t/compilers/pge/p5
Link has been fixed. You can see coverage analysis for configuration
and build tools in reconfigure/ branch at:
http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/configure-build/coverage.html
After this patch is applied, a similarly high degree of test coverage of
config and build tools will prevail in tr
Hi chromatic,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
> The main change is to change all instances of [ 'Test::More' ] and the like to
> [ 'Test'; 'More' ].
Can you point to a document or a thread that explains about why this
change needs to happen?
I'm at work now. I'll work on it tonight.
--
Thanks,
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2007 20:05 schrieb Ron Blaschke:
>> Visual C++ seems to optimize quite heavily, and it looks like it reuses
>> the memory on the stack where arguments are passed for local variables.
>
>> mov dword ptr [ebp+0Ch],edx
>
> All I know about intel c
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 13:42:39 Badai Aqrandista wrote:
Hi Badai,
> I'm new to the list. I'm a Perl Programmer doing web development in my
> day job and I'd like to help. I'll try to commit an hour or two per
> day to parrot project.
Welcome!
> Can you let me know what I should do to get t
On 8/15/07, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This optimization reaches likely back to times, when the opcode engine was
> designed. It's saving one interpreter push statement [1] per JIT calling one
> external function, and I've always thought of it as a very cool (and valid)
> thingy,
Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2007 20:05 schrieb Ron Blaschke:
> As you can see, the code is heavily optimized. The pointer to the
> interpreter is kept on the stack as it should stay the same, only the
> opcode is exchanged. *should* is the key word here.
Well, another note.
This optimization reache
Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2007 20:05 schrieb Ron Blaschke:
> Visual C++ seems to optimize quite heavily, and it looks like it reuses
> the memory on the stack where arguments are passed for local variables.
> mov dword ptr [ebp+0Ch],edx
All I know about intel calling convs would summarize this
Hi,
I'm new to the list. I'm a Perl Programmer doing web development in my
day job and I'd like to help. I'll try to commit an hour or two per
day to parrot project.
Can you let me know what I should do to get this done? I mean, do you
mean I need to change 'lib/Test/More.pm' or
'/runtime/parrot/
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #44663]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44663 >
The Test::More namespace uses 'Test::More' instead of [ 'Test'; 'More' ]. I
prefer the la
Hi,
JIT is currently broken on x86 Windows using optimized Visual C++ builds.
Here's the reason why. Hopefully someone more familiar with the JIT can
pick this up.
...
04e45c9a 68f06fe604 push4E66FF0h
04e45c9f e8370a1c0b call_Parrot_set_returns_pc
04e45ca4 83c404 add
>
> pjcj reported a 403 error on that link. I am regenerating the coverage
> and it should become available in a few minutes. Sorry for any confusion.
>
> kid51
Update: I'll have to fix this later today.
> As this patch has been
> developed in the reconfigure/ branch, all but one configuration-
> related package in lib/Parrot/Configure/* has been pushed to 100%
> statement coverage (see http://thenceforward.net/parrot/coverage/
> configure-build/coverage.html).
pjcj reported a 403 error o
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2007, at 6:27 PM, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > see above. It would have been nice if gcc simply rejected the attribute
> > so that testing the exit status of gcc would be sufficient. gcc-3.4
> > doesn't have this problem. The test could eith
25 matches
Mail list logo