On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:48:54 -0500
Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to document all the PARROT_XXX macros that I've been creating
> and applying, but I'm not sure where they'd be best. I don't think
> pdd07_codingstd.pod is right, because it's not coding standards
> exactly.
On Sunday 15 July 2007 21:48:54 Andy Lester wrote:
> I want to document all the PARROT_XXX macros that I've been creating
> and applying, but I'm not sure where they'd be best. I don't think
> pdd07_codingstd.pod is right, because it's not coding standards
> exactly. I want to talk about defensi
I want to document all the PARROT_XXX macros that I've been creating
and applying, but I'm not sure where they'd be best. I don't think
pdd07_codingstd.pod is right, because it's not coding standards
exactly. I want to talk about defensive programming, and why these
macros are good, and c
Thanks! Applied as r19899.
# New Ticket Created by Bob Wilkinson
# Please include the string: [perl #43927]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43927 >
Hello
I am fairly sure that alot as a contraction of "a lot" is
incorrect En
On 15/07/07, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun Jul 08 12:27:06 2007, jkeen at verizon.net wrote:
> t/examples/shootout.t is failing even worse today than yesterday.
Here's the weekly update: shootout continues to fail on Darwin ... but
it's continuing to pass on Linux (whi
On 14/07/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 14 July 2007 12:57:37 Paul Cochrane wrote:
> I realized a while after having written my last email that I lost a
> bit opportunity in sending such a short reply: to actually *learn*
> something and to improve my skills with Perl. I s
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:45:59AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 10:07:34PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > It seems to run correctly on gentoo running on a sparc.
>
> Is gentoo sparc an architecture with 64 bit pointers (and longs)?
>
> Nicholas Clark
Hi Nicholas
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #43923]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43923 >
The recently added functionality to not regen MANIFEST.SKIP should be
used when determi
On Fri Mar 23 11:37:34 2007, tewk wrote:
> tools/dev/mk_manifest_and_skip.pl should remove file from the MANIFEST
> that are scheduled to be svn deleted.
This problem should be corrected with revisions applied to trunk today
in r19893 (which applied to RT 43847 as well.
Both Coke and I have veri
Revisions applied to trunk in r19893. Thanks for the review, Coke.
Since this responds to the issue you raised in this ticket, I'm
resolving this ticket, but will look at new feature requests in a new
ticket.
On Sun Jul 15 08:29:26 2007, jkeen at verizon.net wrote:
> On Sun Jul 15 06:05:31 2007, coke wrote:
>
> >
> > Doesn't apply cleanly on Revision: 19887
>
> Okay, let's try something else.
>
> I did a fresh checkout from trunk. I then applied the patch attached,
> '3.manifest.patch.txt'. I the
On Sun Jul 08 12:27:06 2007, jkeen at verizon.net wrote:
> t/examples/shootout.t is failing even worse today than yesterday.
Here's the weekly update: shootout continues to fail on Darwin ... but
it's continuing to pass on Linux (which I've upgraded to Debian 4.0).
kid51
t/examples/shootout...
On Sun Jul 15 06:05:31 2007, coke wrote:
>
> Doesn't apply cleanly on Revision: 19887
So what are we to do when patches created with 'svn diff' can't be
processed properly by 'patch'?
I created the patch by creating a branch as a fresh checkout from trunk,
doing 'svn mkdir' for the one new dire
14 matches
Mail list logo
