Chas Owens wrote:
Jonathan Lang wrote:
> Is there any reason why we can't simply define '$a x $n' as being
> shorthand for 'cat($a xx $n)'? In what way does the former differ
> from the latter, other than the use of a Whatever in place of $n?
"$a x $n" is equivalent to "join '', $a xx $n", but
On 6/2/07, Jonathan Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any reason why we can't simply define '$a x $n' as being
shorthand for 'cat($a xx $n)'? In what way does the former differ
from the latter, other than the use of a Whatever in place of $n?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
"$a x $n" is
The attached patch amends the I-reg shift operators so that they
produce results that are consistent with PMC shifts, which produce the
exact value [1]. Shifting left or right by at least the word size
always produces zero, and negative shift values are taken to mean "shift
in the other directi
On Saturday 02 June 2007 13:44:25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> First version of the headerizer works successfully on
> include/parrot/string_funcs.h
This checkin broke at least one test. I know accidents happen, but you've had
at least three checkins that have broken the compile or the tests in t
I started hacking this because I thought I needed it, but that turned
out not to be true. Should I finish it (it still needs tests), or is
there some reason to hold off?
-- Bob Rogers
http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/
Is there any reason why we can't simply define '$a x $n' as being
shorthand for 'cat($a xx $n)'? In what way does the former differ
from the latter, other than the use of a Whatever in place of $n?
--
Jonathan "Dataweaver" Lang
Author: larry
Date: Sat Jun 2 14:45:43 2007
New Revision: 14414
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
First installment of filling out descriptions of operator semantics.
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
===
Author: larry
Date: Sat Jun 2 12:42:11 2007
New Revision: 14413
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S02.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S04.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S09.pod
doc/trunk/design/syn/S13.pod
Log:
Dropped : from all listop
On Thursday 31 May 2007 13:48:04 Paul Cochrane wrote:
> I recently added a test for TODO items in the pod source, but added it
> to the t/doc/ test suite. It is more of a coding standards test
> anyway, and I was wondering if it would be ok if I moved it from the
> doc tests into the coding stand
From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:12:41 -0700
On Fri Jun 01 19:46:40 2007, rgrjr wrote:
> This is from the "Small tweak to Pmc2c.pm" I posted on 19-May and
> committed as r18646 on 26-May. Note that lib/Parrot/Pmc2c.pm is not
> actually do
On 6/2/07, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From my wiki at http://xoa.petdance.com/Use_const_proactively
Const your local variables
The following is adapted from C++ Coding Standards by Herb Sutter and
Andrei Alexandrescu (with some C++-specific stuff removed):
const is your fri
On Fri Jun 01 19:46:40 2007, rgrjr wrote:
> This is from the "Small tweak to Pmc2c.pm" I posted on 19-May and
> committed as r18646 on 26-May. Note that lib/Parrot/Pmc2c.pm is not
> actually doing anything different now, it's just telling you that none
> of the code for these methods is being used
Test now passes on Darwin and Linux. Resolving ticket.
Nicholas Clark wrote:
Works for me! :-)
A note: as possibly the stumbler-upon-this-issue; chromatic's patch made
things work here, right through make smoke.
Thanks.
a
--
Andy Bach, Sys. Mangler
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VOICE: (608) 261-5738 FAX 264-5932
"Capital is only the fruit o
On 6/2/07, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 01 June 2007 16:29:08 Mehmet Yavuz Selim Soyturk wrote:
> After a suggestion of Bernhard at #parrot, I added a function named
> C to parrot:
>
> void * mem__sys_realloc_zeroed(void *from, size_t size, size_t
> old_size)
>
> It zeroes t
15 matches
Mail list logo
